|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
This is a really good option for teams without a lot of resources. Being able to help cooperate will be very useful.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
I would recommend lifting the stack and skiding the previous tote underneath it to increase stack height and decrease elevator size.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Could you expand on that? I'm curious where you are saying to slide the previous tote.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
You take the stack you are in possesion of, lift it up, and move into another tote. Then place your stack on top of the new tote, and pick the whole thing up from the bottom again.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
To clarify the tote stack lift:
If you lift the bottom tote in an existing stack, so long as your center of gravity is stable enough, you could move a stack of theoretically any height onto a single tote thus reducing the amount of height your elevator would require. The trade off here is high loads and thus a more stable center of gravity is required. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
I agree with that method of lifting totes. What material would be durable yet flexible enough for the snapping side pieces?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
It could be rigid, but hinged and spring loaded so that it can only bend upwards.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Just wondering if there is any point advantage to stacking the totes within the robot, or if there is any real advantage to stacking the totes inside the robot in general?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Maybe being able to move stacks
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Quote:
Stack security for another. It may be easier to design a system within your robot to keep tote/containers from falling over when moving about. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Greg,
Do you know if this was designed with one or the Bimba Cylinders that are available to us? We are mentoring a rookie team and this looks like a great option to get them started! Thanks! |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
COG. If your COG gets too far out the chassis (which, for tall stacks, is likely) then you risk tipping a litle bit when you accelerate or stop suddenly. If you tip even a little, you might knock over your totes.
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Greg,
Do you have an approximate lead time for the bushings and bearing plate shown in this design to arrive at AndyMark? Thanks! |
|
#14
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Quote:
I don't know exactly what Bimba is offering for teams this year. The cylinders in this design are 1 1/6 bore 14 inches long. Technically anything longer than 13 inches should work, you would just be using more air per lift than you need. You could also put stopper blocks (pvc pipe) on the shaft to limit the stroke if only longer ones are available. The ones I used in the design were from Mcmaster http://www.mcmaster.com/#standard-air-cylinders/=vd6415 Quote:
How far inside your robot is really a factor of how many totes you want to stack and what amount of control you want to have of the totes as you drive around. If you have them all the way outside your robot, making turns at fast speeds become problematic. The other reason why in this design I only did it half way (besides accommodating the Kit chassis) was to make it so you don't have to drive on the scoring platform when placing totes. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: REV Robotics Simple Lift
Greg, I know you said it would be in to Andymark by the weekend, but unless I missed it, I doesn't seem to be in yet. Any ETA or updates?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|