|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: 2015 FRC Championship History
I understand the reasoning behind the diminishing effect, I was just curious about the value chosen. With the current number ~80% of a team's ranking comes from the most recent 4 years.
I don't think there is a number everyone can agree upon. I would use a bigger weight that 66%, so that older years have more weight. It seems to me that mentors and sponsors are a big part of a teams success, and that they have a slower turnover rate. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|