|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Boulder shenanigans
Is each team in charge of knowing how many boulders are in the opposing castle?
Situation: If the opposing team has 5 boulders in the castle and I am aware of that and my team at that instance can score two boulders should I score one and wait until the opposing team introduces one onto the field or can our team score both? G34 No more than six (6) BOULDERS may remain in a CASTLE at any time. If the BOULDER count ever exceeds six (6), excess BOULDERS must be introduced to the FIELD immediately. Violation: FOUL per excess BOULDER In the situation given if two boulders are scored the opposing side now has 7 boulders which is 1 foul because our team scored. Of Course per G11 G11 Strategies aimed solely at forcing the opposing ALLIANCE to violate a rule are not in the spirit of FIRST Robotics Competition and not allowed. Rule violations forced in this manner will not result in an assignment of a penalty to the targeted ALLIANCE. Violation: FOUL. If egregious or repeated, YELLOW CARD Is it solely one teams burden to keep less then 6 boulders in the castle, or is it the responsibility of both teams. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Boulder shenanigans
As I read G34, each team is in charge of making sure their castle doesn't have more than 6 boulders in it. If there's 5 boulders in our castle, and you shoot in 2 more, than our human player has to immediately release at least one of them to the field. We only incur a foul if we let the 7 boulders remain. We have a grace period to get rid of a boulder before we get a foul.
I don't think anyone could violate rule G11 by filling the opponent's castle with boulders. That's one of the primary ways of scoring; classifying it as a "strategy aimed solely at forcing the opposing ALLIANCE to violate a rule" would just be perverse. Last edited by alopex_rex : 01-10-2016 at 04:01 PM. Reason: pronoun clarity |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Boulder shenanigans
The key word in G11 is "solely" (as I read it, of course). Is your strategy of scoring a boulder aimed at making them take a penalty? Perhaps, they can't really know. However, they certainly can see that scoring a boulder would have a benefit for you other than your opponents taking a penalty, and thus, it cannot be the sole reason that you are taking that action.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Boulder shenanigans
In addition to what's been said above, the way I read G34, it's okay to have 7+ boulders so long as the human players immediately pick up the excess and introduce them to the field; as such, you can't really 'force' the foul to get a G11.
The rule might still be flawed, though; check out G33: Quote:
Imagine: the red alliance elects to give all 3 of their auto boulders to their human players, starting the match with 6 boulders in their castle. Then, once auto starts, the blue alliance spy bot scores a boulder in the first few seconds. Now what? The red alliance has 7 boulders; they can't legally introduce one to the field until teleop, nor can they legally keep them all. Are they fouled? Is G11 called on the blue alliance? |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Boulder shenanigans
Quote:
Perhaps the "immediately" grace period extends until after Teleop begins. A question for Q&A. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Boulder shenanigans
Agreed, and that interpretation of 'immediately' is how I expect the GDC to respond.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Boulder shenanigans
Maybe if we get lucky they will just say chute door.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Boulder shenanigans
I would think so too... as if you interpret it the other way, whatver the human player did they'd get a foul. Be it for breaking the starting line or not purging boulders in time. Still I agree, Q&A should be the ones to say such, so that it gets clarified in the rules.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|