|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
This is a joke. The bar is an entirely different obstacle now. Shouldn't have rolled this out till next week so teams had time to prepare...
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Seeing as FIRST basically had no low bar flaps left after week 1, no matter what they did it would have been "an entirely different obstacle". This seems like the closest they could get to the former behavior on their tight schedule.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
That's definitely not the most attractive solution I've seen to a problem. How fast and easily do they get pushed sideways and get hung up on the zip ties on the bar?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Unless something changes in the morning, Kansas City was still using regular low bar coverings, except they are made from red and blue bumper material.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Quote:
Hopefully Kansas City switches to the new method for the actual matches. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
It's also due to shipments. The places close to carr warehouses and all will get them first than others.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Has anyone actively tried to get a boulder through this? I know it's "technically" illegal but if someone can get the ball through the gaps after they've potentially been disrupted and moved by a robot isn't that more of just a poor design by the GDC then a foul or illegal movement of a boulder by a team.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Quote:
I was also playing around with one of the low bars -- as a result of the rubbery material the flaps are made of, it's close to impossible to get it to swing all the way around the bar as the fabric did. I couldn't tell exactly how much room it was taking up, but I think it was about half an inch under the low bar, so some teams that are close to 14" could have a little unexpected fun this weekend getting through. Last edited by Jacob Bendicksen : 11-03-2016 at 00:48. Reason: grammar...it's late |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
It seems the new strips are ziptied to each other, so they all move as one, so it shouldn't be too much of an entanglement problem.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Quote:
As per flipping them around (not your post, but it's early so I really don't want to go back and quote theirs too!), it hasn't seemed like too much of an issue here in Arkansas. That might not be true today or in other places, but it does appear that the flaps fling outward just so that it lets robots through fairly easily. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Thanks for sharing the picture!
Hopefully this'll work alright... |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Quote:
Everyone that I've seen go under the lowbar (so far) has seemingly gone under it the same as they would with the normal flap. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
Quote:
I'm especially troubled by the early reports that this vinyl makes the low bar effectively shorter. Making the biggest design constraint in this game even tougher, long after we're finished with our robots, instead of "just" buying tougher fabric? For once I'm glad I competed Week 1 and not Week 2! |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: New low bar flaps
FWIW, the material is surprisingly heavy as a curtain, and is just as effective as the previous style of low bar for preventing balls from passing.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|