|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2016 Midwest Regional
Quote:
Since this is you doubling down on it I guess so... Obvious disclaimer - teams can pick for whatever reason they want. When building an alliance you should try to build one that can WIN. [1] Rather than pick teams cuz they are from a far away land, you should pick because you think they would contribute positively [2]. Ok, that's one. Second, you make a couple assumptions that the teams you propose pity picking [3] will be a) not in a picking position b) not worth picking in those spots c) not wanting to actually win the event anyway. Third, let's assume the #1 seed decides to pick one of these teams[4] what would the harm be in them having been picked if they win it all? [5] [1] Last I checked, this was a competition... just checked again, yup still has Competition in the name. [2] See previous comments about it being a COMPETITION [3] My words, not yours. But the words are there under your GPness veneer. [4] Presumably for reasons that make sense like, idk, actually contributing to the alliance. [5] There's a slight implication here I don't think you meant that you don't want them winning. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|