paper: Einstein History

[mipo0707]

33 should have a win too with 233 and 2056

[Citrus Dad]

Surprised to see that Ontario (54) and New Jersey (51) are so close. Ontario has a larger population, so its not at a disadvantage. Michigan is only a bit bigger than NJ but scores 170.

[Jefferson]

Originally Posted by Citrus Dad

Surprised to see that Ontario (54) and New Jersey (51) are so close. Ontario has a larger population, so its not at a disadvantage. Michigan is only a bit bigger than NJ but scores 170.

I did this because your comment made me curious. Thought others might be as well. Below is the people per point for each state. The real standouts are MI and CT

State	 Population/Score 
MI	 58,293 
CT	 71,934 
DE	 116,952 
NH	 132,681 
NV	 141,955 
NJ	 175,258 
IN	 188,482 
AR	 249,507 
CA	 253,611 
ON	 255,409 
MA	 281,059 
IL	 292,740 
NOR	 339,650 
OH	 362,318 
AZ	 517,806 
RI	 527,587 
NY	 598,371 
TX	 599,044 
FL	 621,666 
HI	 709,781 
SC	 805,414 
QBC	 826,360 
VA	 832,629 
NC	 903,997 
MN	 909,529 
PA	 913,372 
WI	 959,594 
CEN	 1,012,250 
MS	 1,492,463 
ID	 1,634,464 
TN	 1,637,338 
WV	 1,850,326 
OR	 1,985,120 
ALB	 2,098,250 
GA	 5,048,672 
MO	 6,063,589 
WA	 7,061,530 
NSW	 7,500,000

[Hitchhiker 42]

Originally Posted by Jefferson

I did this because your comment made me curious. Thought others might be as well. Below is the people per point for each state. The real standouts are MI and CT

I'm proud of my little state...

[Brian Maher]

Originally Posted by Citrus Dad

New Jersey (51) ... Michigan is only a bit bigger than NJ but scores 170.

In terms of general population, yes, Michigan is only a bit bigger than New Jersey. In terms of team count, Michigan boasts more than five times as many teams as NJ (411 vs 76).

[jgerstein]

Thanks for the data!

Just a quick note, 694 is from New York, not Ohio.

[Hitchhiker 42]

Originally Posted by jgerstein

Thanks for the data!

Just a quick note, 694 is from New York, not Ohio.

The worksheet has them down as from NY. I think you may have accidentally saw the row above them, 610 who are from ON.

[SteveGarward]

111 has won 3 championships, including 2003. Looks like the data from 2003 on TBA is... not quite right. The page on FIRST is not responding for me to check the source.

[Hitchhiker 42]

Originally Posted by SteveGarward

111 has won 3 championships, including 2003. Looks like the data from 2003 on TBA is... not quite right. The page on FIRST is not responding for me to check the source.

For 2003, both alliances are listed as finalists on TBA, and no winner. Should I switch that to both alliances as winners, or keep them this way?

[smitikshah]

Awesome work Mark! It's fun to pass the time looking at this data and analyzing for my own conclusions!

[Jake177]

Originally Posted by Hitchhiker 42

For 2003, both alliances are listed as finalists on TBA, and no winner. Should I switch that to both alliances as winners, or keep them this way?

If you look at the awards page, it shows the winning alliance (65, 469, 111) and the finalist alliance (25, 494, 343).
http://www.thebluealliance.com/event/2003cmp#awards

2003 is also missing the SF teams: 236, 341, 175, 378, 292, 302

[Hitchhiker 42]

Originally Posted by Jake177

If you look at the awards page, it shows the winning alliance (65, 469, 111) and the finalist alliance (25, 494, 343).
http://www.thebluealliance.com/event/2003cmp#awards

2003 is also missing the SF teams: 236, 341, 175, 378, 292, 302

Ok, thank you. I'm adding that to my data set right now. In general, if anyone has any data that's missing from the spreadsheet, I'll be happy to take it and fill it in!

[Joe Ross]

You may be interested in comparing your data against this: https://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/3263

[MARS_James]

Originally Posted by mipo0707

33 should have a win too with 233 and 2056

..... from when?

[mipo0707]

Originally Posted by MARS_James

..... from when?

No I mean like they all are long due to win worlds