|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Stop the Stop Build
I beg to disagree.
FRC isn't an on-the-field competition. FRC *includes* an on-the-field competition. Last edited by gblake : 21-10-2016 at 19:48. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: Stop the Stop Build
Quote:
*FRC* is a competition. *FIRST* includes a competition (FRC). There may be methods to pursue the FIRST mission that do not include a competition. However, the method FRC chose does include a competition. It's in the name. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Stop the Stop Build
I know what you're trying to say, but I think this is a bit pedantic and derailing. We are discussing a change to the rules of the robotics competition, so we are of course focused on the impact this competition rules change has to the robotics competition.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Stop the Stop Build
Quote:
The post I replied to appeared to tell someone introducing a bit of the bigger picture, that anything less than single-mindedly dedicating a team to winning FRC's competition is a mistake. I think we can be confident FIRST HQ has an eye on the bigger picture that includes FIRST's primary mission, *and* on the health of the important competition that supports that primary mission. Why not ensure both are emphasized in this conversation? I'm guessing that FIRST HQ and CD will find the result more persuasive than they would otherwise. If I was derailing, please give me credit for trying to derail us onto a set of tracks that takes us to our destination, not past it. Blake Last edited by gblake : 22-10-2016 at 01:51. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: paper: Stop the Stop Build
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|