|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 4143 differential swerve concept
This is an interesting concept for FRC, and one that has seen use in plenty of industrial systems.
For FRC, your next iteration is to make it ... ... triple coaxial ![]() For a modelling proof, there are some really nice features (symmetry, use of TB Nano, low custom part count) in this design. Last edited by JesseK : 16-12-2016 at 10:05. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 4143 differential swerve concept
If you didn't wamt steering motors on the modules, couldn't you just put a gearbox in the middle and belt-drive it to each module? Saves motors and weight.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 4143 differential swerve concept
Say this was geared for 10ft/s and the two wheels on the module were 2 inches apart on center. Not taking friction into account, and assuming there's enough torque to turn the module, the module would be capable of rotating at approximately 1200rpm.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 4143 differential swerve concept
This is awesome. Always impressed with what 4143 comes up with!
I'm afraid if the motor allowance rules remain as they were last year, you'd only be able to make 3 of these modules. If at FIRST you want to succeed, try triangle robot? |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|