|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 4143 differential swerve concept
Do your thoughts on overall plausibility change if a non-standard wheel configuration (e.g. 3 pods in a triangle) is used?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 4143 differential swerve concept
Interesting design, one thought though:
Assuming FIRST keeps the same rules that they have the past few years, in all likelihood there will be a limit of 4-6 CIMs on a robot which would make this design as shown illegal assuming 4 wheel swerve. That said, you could just swap them out for MiniCIMs. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|