Go to Post Dean: We encourage kids to learn about science, technology.... Colbert: And does that include creation science? Dean: .... Well we teach kids to be very creative..... - Kevin Sevcik [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Competition > Rules/Strategy
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 00:22
Bob Steele's Avatar
Bob Steele Bob Steele is offline
Professional Steamacrit Hunter
AKA: Bob Steele
FRC #1983 (Skunk Works Robotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Seattle, Washington
Posts: 1,539
Bob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond reputeBob Steele has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekcrbe View Post
I won't make any claims about how the GDC would feel about this or if it fits the "intent" of the game. I'll just say that if you approached me, as a coach or driver, with this idea, I'd say no. If I think we can beat you, I want to do it straight up. If I think we can't, I don't expect that this will help. Either way, if you think this is a good idea, I'm assuming you know something I don't and are trying to exploit it, either to beat us or earn bonus ranking points you couldn't otherwise get. Meanwhile, I can't guarantee it will work out for my alliance.

The issue, as others have pointed out, is that this is a prisoner's dilemma problem. Abandoning the agreement has benefits for either alliance, unlike, say, agreeing not to throw noodles until after the co-op stack is complete. Call me cynical, but I wouldn't take the deal. There's nothing in it for me.
+1

I am of the opinion that you play the game. This game's rules want teams to work to get their gears and the fuel.... Your team designs a robot that will accomplish the tasks of the game. Agreeing to make it easier on each other will do nothing but amplify the advantage that really good teams have right now..... If you are a good fuel scoring robot.... this is perfect. Every ball you put in will come right back to you.... so keep scoring If you could shoot from the middle loading station in your own alliance you could almost shoot continuously.... This is not what the game designers intended.... I am pretty certain of that.

Our team will play the game with gracious professionalism but will play to win....

If approached about this I would counsel my drive team to politely decline.

Other teams can choose to do whatever they see as proper for themselves.
__________________
Raisbeck Aviation High School TEAM 1983 - Seattle, Washington
Las Vegas 07 WINNER w/ 1425/254...Seattle 08 WINNER w/ 2046/949.. Oregon 09 WINNER w/1318/2635..SEA 10 RCA ..Spokane 12 WINNER w/2122/4082 and RCA...Central Wa 13 WINNER w/1425/753..Seattle 13 WINNER w/948/492 & RCA ..Spokane 13 WINNER w/2471/4125.. Spokane 14 - DCA --Auburn 14 - WINNER w/1318/4960..District CMP 14 WINNER w/1318/2907, District CMA.. CMP 14 Newton Finalist w 971/341/3147 ... Auburn Mountainview 15 WINNER w/1318/3049 - Mt Vernon 15 WINNER w/1318/4654 - Philomath 15 WINNER w/955/847 -District CMP 15 WINNER w/955/2930 & District CMA -CMP Newton -Industrial Design Award

Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 01:13
RoboChair's Avatar
RoboChair RoboChair is offline
He who fixes with hammers #tsimfd
AKA: Devin Castellucci
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits and 5458 Digital Minds)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 706
RoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond reputeRoboChair has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Just Say No To Game Objective Agreements!




please
__________________

12 Years and counting! Over a third of my life has been spent with FRC.
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 01:29
dtengineering's Avatar
dtengineering dtengineering is offline
Teaching Teachers to Teach Tech
AKA: Jason Brett
no team (British Columbia FRC teams)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,833
dtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond reputedtengineering has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

So... if your team was approached by the other alliance to say, "Just so you know, we think that the goal of the game is to score lots and lots of points. We're going to put everything we have into offense, and we hope you do the same. We'll both score higher, possibly earn more ranking points, do less damage to our robots and put on a better show for the audience if we both focus on offense instead of defense."

Are they trying to undermine the game, or improve the game? Would saying, "Great idea! We'll do the same!" be G.P?

Jason
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 01:49
Ekcrbe's Avatar
Ekcrbe Ekcrbe is offline
When can I watch Einstein again?
AKA: Erik Boyle
FRC #4640 (Metallic Panthers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 334
Ekcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dtengineering View Post
So... if your team was approached by the other alliance to say, "Just so you know, we think that the goal of the game is to score lots and lots of points. We're going to put everything we have into offense, and we hope you do the same. We'll both score higher, possibly earn more ranking points, do less damage to our robots and put on a better show for the audience if we both focus on offense instead of defense."

Are they trying to undermine the game, or improve the game? Would saying, "Great idea! We'll do the same!" be G.P?

Jason
That's neither undermining nor improving the game. If they don't want to defend us, so be it. Maybe we agree that our best plan is to score and not try to defend them either, but no promises. That depends on what our three teams agree the best strategy is for that match. If we need 4 RPs to get into a good picking position, we'll probably argue to our partners to go all out offense. If it's our last qualification match and we're playing against and outgunned by Team A, who is ranked #2 and 3 RPs behind Team B for #1, and Team B wants to pick us, but Team A would rather pick Team B if they can seed #1, you'd better bet that we want to play some heavy hitting defense and make sure Team A can't get either bonus RP, even if they beat us in the match.

But those are just contrived examples. The point is, when we step on the field, we're there to win, whether that means the match or the competition. That means that we craft match strategy based on what is best for our alliance. Now, I'm not against co-opertition. If the GDC writes it into the rules, I'll gladly play along. I even like the message it sends. You could say I'm pro-co-opertition on the whole. But if it's just you telling me we should run a certain strategy for your sake, don't count on it.
__________________
Four years of FRC 68 Truck Town Thunder
2012 Championship Newton Division Finalists—Thanks 330 and 639 for the Full Court Press!
2013 Kettering University District Chairman's Award Winners!
2014 Great Lakes Bay Region District Winners—Thanks 288, 4819, and 5166! | 2014 Waterford District Chairman's Award Winners! | 2014 Michigan FRC State Championship Chairman's Award Winners—Congratulations 33 and 503!
2015 Center Line District Chairman's Award Winners! | 2015 Lansing District Winners—Thanks 314 and 1684! | 2015 FIRST in Michigan District Championship Chairman's Award Winners—Congratulations 503 and 2137!


Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 13:37
gblake's Avatar
gblake gblake is offline
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,942
gblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekcrbe View Post
That's neither undermining nor improving the game. If they don't want to defend us, so be it. Maybe we agree that our best plan is to score and not try to defend them either, but no promises. ...
I think Jason was suggesting that implementing the OP's suggestion of active cooperation, rather than passive avoidance, would be an excellent way for both alliances to maximize their points.
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate

Last edited by gblake : 26-01-2017 at 13:46.
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 13:53
Eric Scheuing's Avatar
Eric Scheuing Eric Scheuing is offline
Registered User
FRC #0999 (MechaRAMS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Cheshire, CT
Posts: 415
Eric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud of
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoboChair View Post
Just Say No To Game Objective Agreements!
Let's create a "no more agreements" agreement.
__________________




2005-2007: Bobcat Robotics 177
2015-20XX: MechaRAMS 999
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 14:20
Ekcrbe's Avatar
Ekcrbe Ekcrbe is offline
When can I watch Einstein again?
AKA: Erik Boyle
FRC #4640 (Metallic Panthers)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 334
Ekcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond reputeEkcrbe has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblake View Post
I think Jason was suggesting that implementing the OP's suggestion of active cooperation, rather than passive avoidance, would be an excellent way for both alliances to maximize their points.
It is, but I don't think it qualifies as improving the game. Did the early-90s 49ers teams play football "better" than the late-70s Steelers because they had a great offense rather than a great defense? I don't think so.

Sure, offensive play can be more fun for spectators to watch, and I'd prefer to have exciting, spectator-friendly games every year. I think they're better for the program and its outreach efforts. But as a team and an alliance, it isn't always in our best interest to avoid playing defense, even if our opponents say they won't defend us. We may judge our best chance to win a match is by defending. It's FIRST's job as the game designers, not ours as the competitors, to ensure that the spectators are entertained.
__________________
Four years of FRC 68 Truck Town Thunder
2012 Championship Newton Division Finalists—Thanks 330 and 639 for the Full Court Press!
2013 Kettering University District Chairman's Award Winners!
2014 Great Lakes Bay Region District Winners—Thanks 288, 4819, and 5166! | 2014 Waterford District Chairman's Award Winners! | 2014 Michigan FRC State Championship Chairman's Award Winners—Congratulations 33 and 503!
2015 Center Line District Chairman's Award Winners! | 2015 Lansing District Winners—Thanks 314 and 1684! | 2015 FIRST in Michigan District Championship Chairman's Award Winners—Congratulations 503 and 2137!


Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 15:00
natejo99's Avatar
natejo99 natejo99 is offline
Captain/Human Player
AKA: Nate Johansen
FRC #0074 (Team C.H.A.O.S.)
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 84
natejo99 is on a distinguished road
Re: On side ball use agreement.

I don't see this working out in any way. As much as I hate to say it, there are teams who don't abide by GP, and who will exploit this agreement. And reputation may spread, but at that point they've already benefited from it and gotten the ranking point(s). As soon as that starts happening, I think it'll be hard to find teams who will accept such an agreement, just to make sure they don't get snaked. I could be wrong, and this could work out wonderfully for both sides, but I can tell you that I would not take the risk by accepting this sort of deal.
__________________
2013-Present - Student, FRC 74
2014 FRC Champions - 254, 469, 2848, 74
2014 FRC MSC Finalists - 1718, 67, 74
2016 Traverse City District Winners - 3688, 74, 6128
2016 Tesla Quarterfinalists - 74, 2054, 4468, 3238



Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 15:47
Fields's Avatar
Fields Fields is offline
Classic
no team
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 118
Fields is a name known to allFields is a name known to allFields is a name known to allFields is a name known to allFields is a name known to allFields is a name known to all
Re: On side ball use agreement.

It would be nice if the GDC could just add a new rule:
No prisoner dilemma deals are to be made.

But... I'm sure someone would find another way around it.
It's fun when you find a cool little "loophole" (2015 multi-bots and conveyors), annoying when we have to play lawyer. (agreements and flashlights)
__________________
Wait... you built what now?
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 16:07
Eric Scheuing's Avatar
Eric Scheuing Eric Scheuing is offline
Registered User
FRC #0999 (MechaRAMS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Cheshire, CT
Posts: 415
Eric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud ofEric Scheuing has much to be proud of
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by natejo99 View Post
... at that point they've already benefited from it and gotten the ranking point(s).
This is why I think these agreements will never work. For them to gain traction, every single team at an event has to agree to participate. If one team denies participation, it gives them an advantage from a ranking perspective and other teams will need to abandon the agreement to keep up.
__________________




2005-2007: Bobcat Robotics 177
2015-20XX: MechaRAMS 999
Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 17:44
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,074
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fields View Post
It would be nice if the GDC could just add a new rule:
No prisoner dilemma deals are to be made.
It would be nice if the GDC would quit making games where the optimal decisions to minimize seed are often prisoner dilemma deals.
Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 19:48
Citrus Dad's Avatar
Citrus Dad Citrus Dad is offline
Business and Scouting Mentor
AKA: Richard McCann
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Davis
Posts: 994
Citrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond reputeCitrus Dad has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bstew View Post
There were agreements in 2015 where opposing alliances agreed to do coopertition together or even withheld from throwing litter until a coopertition stack had been finished. These agreements mutually benefited both alliances and I would consider playing to the best of their abilities. However, the GDC did prevent the noodle agreement from happening which was just another (possibly game breaking) form of coopertition or agreement.
Another group of agreements in 2015 was between elims competitors to split the cans rather than competing over them during the quarter finals. That allowed both teams to maximize scores for moving onto the semis. On Einstein this was the norm since all of the teams had can grabbing capabilities.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 20:15
gblake's Avatar
gblake gblake is offline
6th Gear Developer; Mentor
AKA: Blake Ross
no team (6th Gear)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,942
gblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond reputegblake has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Sykes View Post
It would be nice if the GDC would quit making games where the optimal decisions to minimize seed are often prisoner dilemma deals.
Don't be a hater.

Embrace the challenge; and use the opportunity to teach students to use slightly-more-sophisticated-than-normal analysis/thinking to help them navigate the world's many non-linearities, including ethics' many shades of gray.

Like so many other topics, this is a subject that doesn't fit well into the superficialities of tweet-sized sound bites. That makes it a fun one.

Blake
__________________
Blake Ross, For emailing me, in the verizon.net domain, I am blake
VRC Team Mentor, FTC volunteer, 5th Gear Developer, Husband, Father, Triangle Fraternity Alumnus (ky 76), U Ky BSEE, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Kentucky Colonel
Words/phrases I avoid: basis, mitigate, leveraging, transitioning, impact (instead of affect/effect), facilitate, programmatic, problematic, issue (instead of problem), latency (instead of delay), dependency (instead of prerequisite), connectivity, usage & utilize (instead of use), downed, functionality, functional, power on, descore, alumni (instead of alumnus/alumna), the enterprise, methodology, nomenclature, form factor (instead of size or shape), competency, modality, provided(with), provision(ing), irregardless/irrespective, signage, colorized, pulsating, ideate
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 22:18
bstew's Avatar
bstew bstew is offline
Registered User
FRC #3928 (Team Neutrino)
Team Role: CAD
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 62
bstew is a splendid one to beholdbstew is a splendid one to beholdbstew is a splendid one to beholdbstew is a splendid one to beholdbstew is a splendid one to beholdbstew is a splendid one to beholdbstew is a splendid one to behold
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Scheuing View Post
This is why I think these agreements will never work. For them to gain traction, every single team at an event has to agree to participate. If one team denies participation, it gives them an advantage from a ranking perspective and other teams will need to abandon the agreement to keep up.
If every team is participating, that will just inflate the average RP should not really change up the rankings. However, contrary to what you are saying, if a single team does not participate in these agreements, whereas every match they are not in, they will be in a net disadvantage.

I fail to see how any team would do this strategy, if not for their benefit. In an ideal situation where this strategy is beneficial to both alliances, denying participation is only detrimental to your rankings. Why would other teams give up this agreement if it had any benefit?

I do agree that these agreements are unlikely to happen in practice, but it would be nice for the GDC to show a definite intent.
Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 26-01-2017, 22:31
Caleb Sykes's Avatar
Caleb Sykes Caleb Sykes is offline
Registered User
FRC #4536 (MinuteBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 1,074
Caleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond reputeCaleb Sykes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: On side ball use agreement.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblake View Post
Don't be a hater.
I don't think I'm a hater, but I do tend to disagree with many decisions the GDC makes.

Quote:
Embrace the challenge; and use the opportunity to teach students to use slightly-more-sophisticated-than-normal analysis/thinking to help them navigate the world's many non-linearities, including ethics' many shades of gray.
I don't believe there is any ethical dilemma here. In my opinion, there is absolutely nothing unethical about two alliances agreeing to work together to score more points. If anyone actually does believe this is inherently unethical, I would love to hear why coopertition in 2012 and 2015 was ethical but this is not.

Quote:
Like so many other topics, this is a subject that doesn't fit well into the superficialities of tweet-sized sound bites. That makes it a fun one.
To each his own, but I find it more fun to play games where I can just focus on winning than to play games where I have to focus on maximizing some other metric.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi