|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
The design we developed, like the TeknoKat design, actually prefers shifting on-the-fly over shifting while stopped. One of the things that makes this possible is the chamfering on the tips of the teeth of the shifting gears, which tends to guide the teeth into a proper meshing configuration as the shifting gear moves (we were also careful to break any sharp corners on the edges of the entire tooth with a needle file, to further reduce the chance of binding).
If you were designing a transmission that was going to see hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of operational cycles, then you wouldn't do it this way. But given that this system is probably only going to see a few hundred shifts at the most, the abuse heaped on the gears with this design should not be too much of an issue. -dave |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| White Paper Discuss: Drive Train Basics | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 6 | 09-06-2012 11:42 AM |
| White Paper Discuss: Dual Motor Gearbox - 2003 | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 6 | 04-08-2004 07:46 PM |
| White Paper Discuss: 2 speed, Shift-on-the-fly TechnoKat Gearbox | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 35 | 01-23-2004 08:16 PM |
| White Paper Discuss: Standard Drive Photos | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 5 | 11-20-2003 08:00 PM |
| "Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 01-29-2002 12:32 PM |