|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: White Paper Discuss: Team 179 conceptual - single speed - 3 motor gearbox
Welded gears - you're pointing out that the key will shear before the teeth come off? I'd like to go with keys, and I don't want to warp the shafts - but back to the intent of this design as cheap and quick, and can it last a few months - maybe not. I haven't checked out that loctite #609 Andy mentions yet. That sounds pretty cool if there's a bond that can take those torques without a key- wow.
Anyhow, this is still more of a risky design, that I want to test to see if like Andy says, will it get me through 4 competitions, not will it run for 6 years. "Cheap and Cheerful" as my colleague puts it. no 32 pitch on the .7 plastic gear, yah I agree - I think I'm just going to use this as a 2 motor design, as it's original intent. But I might towards the end of it's life throw the FP on there just to see what happens. The nice thing was that to accomodate the FP all I had to do was put a hole in the sideplate. Shaft output, yah - we used this method off the plastic gearboxes the last 2 seasons just coupling straight out to another bridged/bearing shaft. It wasn't pretty but what we did was shim the motor mounts to the transmission wherever it wound up. But if the design permits I might throw a sprocket right on that output shaft instead of a coupling. The problem with this motor configuration is that you don't have a clear access side since motors protrude from both sides. I like the look of the new Andymarkbiz setup - with both on the same side. 1/8 side plates should be ok since I've got them sandwiched with 6 spacers over a small area. 1/8 plate is tough stuff. Unless we do put the sprocket right on the output shaft, then she'll see some much more significant loads. I know my views on all this make conservative folk cringe but I think if it works it's all worth it- Come on you gotta admit it Thankyou guys for your input, it's all very helpfull. I'll be sharing it with the build team. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: White Paper Discuss: Team 179 conceptual - single speed - 3 motor gearbox
Good so the stock carbon steel 24 pitch gears work :-)
I think I'm going to switch the bearings to the Sintered Bronze, Oilite flange bearings on Small parts - those things are $1.50 ea. also going to look into the #609 loctite for gear bonding vs. welds Now we're talking! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: White Paper Discuss: Team 179 conceptual - single speed - 3 motor gearbox
Quote:
I strongly recomend staying with roller bearings. I have seen may teams learn this lesson. The way I look at it, we are all limited by the amount of energy we can put into our motors. A design that has less parasitic losses will put more of that energy to the ground. Matt"s $0.02 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| White Paper Discuss: Continuing the Cycle: A Guide to Starting a University-Supported FIRST Team | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 15-05-2006 14:58 |
| Robot Collaboration | Karthik | General Forum | 153 | 18-02-2004 03:40 |
| White Paper Discuss: Team 159 3.0 | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 24-06-2003 17:18 |
| The 2003 Index of team's post about their robot... | Ken Leung | Robot Showcase | 4 | 28-02-2003 00:18 |