|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#14
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: Telescopic Arm and grabber design help
Quote:
There is no inherent reason why a 2 joint arm should always fail, but there are many non-obvious reasons why a particular design might. Quote:
1) keep the proper tension 2) make sure that cables only have to move in the plane of the pulley 3) minimize slack 4) have a means of adjusting the cable length to make it easier to do 1 and 3 5) have cable to pull both ways, the cables should be driven off of the same drum if possible 6) keep the proper tension 7) be nice to your motor (this goes for arms too) never design it to require more than 25% of stall torque in normal operation then you will have plenty of margin for those exceptional occurrences. 8) keep the proper tension We have had telescoping lifts that have gone to 12' and more and have never had an issue with binding or had a major failure in competition. We have broken cables but nothing more serious than that and even those have been rare and due to operator mistakes. Done properly a cable system can be very low maintenance, but ignore the above and you risk having a kinked rat's nest. There are other ways of telescoping, but compared to a cable set up the range is limited and they are heavy. Ball screws are linear actuators thatwill work if you don't want to go too far. I'd say if you only want to extend a foot or so they might be worth a look. But if you want to go to 10' then they will probably be pretty heavy. If you have questions or need help with a specific design feel free to PM me. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Team Hammond 2 | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 9 | 28-03-2004 00:55 |
| WHich motor to lift and for arm | thoughtful | Motors | 8 | 25-02-2004 10:34 |
| We're really not that mean. | archiver | 1999 | 59 | 23-06-2002 22:49 |