|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Wildstang 2005
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Wildstang 2005
nice job wildstang lol
![]() |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Wildstang 2005
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: pic: Wildstang 2005
Why go so high - we asked ourselves the same question - there is minimal advantage to going so high. Yes, we are foolish only because we have a reputation of making high lifts and we had to live up to our tradition. It just would not have been right for us to go only 10 feet high even if that is all anyone would need 95% of time.
It would not surprise me to see another team go higher. But we did not want to just be "average" height. It is fairly stable at that height - we do have a "base expansion" mechanisum and alot of weight down low and at the opposite end. We did drive around slowly while up high but quick spins are out of the question. By the way, it is a side goal - not the center goal. How long? Well much longer than 2 minutes. Like I said, you have to manever slowly when at that height. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 2005 Field before kickoff started officially | Tom Schindler | Extra Discussion | 2 | 01-08-2005 10:27 AM |
| pic: 2005 FIRST Senior Mentors | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 21 | 12-23-2004 01:38 PM |
| pic: 2005 Game supplies? | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 5 | 11-02-2004 06:31 PM |
| [Official 2005 Game Design] OK, so YOU design the 2005 game... | dlavery | FRC Game Design | 37 | 10-26-2004 11:15 PM |
| Your Thoughts on the 2005 Championship Eligibility Criteria! | dez250 | Championship Event | 57 | 09-10-2004 02:59 PM |