Camera Issues -- So close yet so far.

[team66t-money]

Well my hat is off to our world champions.. congrats. But this year in our journey i have found problems. as some of you know our team used vision, for auto. one of the few teams who actually got it working. But for some reason FIRST did not ban green from the game our anywhere around it, i think that because they did not do this they pretty much ripped our chance of making it farther in the finals in our division and maybe further in the championship. in the first match of our division finals the announcer for curie had green hair and pretty much an all green shirt on our camera was programmed to find all shades of the vision green because the lights going on and off changes but anyways my team asked him politely to move until autonomous mode was over, he did move but not far enough the camera picked him up drove forward turned to him and pretty much tried attacking him, we had so much power behind our robot that it slammed into the side and finally our manipulator flipped up over the side and snapped the steel cable for our arm then the ref wanted to give us a penalty for slamming other robots when they come after us first. i know that there is nothing that can be done but, next year if FIRST uses the camera our in the future they need to ban that certain color from around the field because it could really hurt another team our it just might get some one hurt. so please go to first and let them know something must be done not to let this happen again. though there was a lot learned by using the vision but it come to be more of a disadvantage than anything, beside the national award that we received i think that FIRST also needs to reward the more advanced robots more points for all of the hard work i don't think what is available is enough. Once again i am sorry to not use a lot of punc. i don't like for some reason using it while i am typing but thank you and great season and see you guys next year.

[Eugenia Gabrielov]

I won't comment on your pronunciation to much extent, though it was hard to follow.

I find it interesting that you mention the green. There has been quite the good amount of discussion about it in the past, and it seems that people came to a general consensus that green was ok. I wish you wrent' forced to expereince this, but please try to look at it in the sense that now that you understand your robot's ability to put a good deal of power into its actions and that you programmed it accurately, that in the future you may need to deal with adjusting this kind of programming on the fly.

If that announcer hadn't been standing there, something else green would have. I wish you luck in the future, and I hope you won't look at this as a cause for you not continuing to a certain level. There are many more factors than a match with an issue in the effect of winning competition.

Sincerely,
Genia

[PURPLE!]

Our program was so close... then the lighting on the field came up. Wow... talk about inconsistent. By the time the robot found the green it would go up then cast a shadow on it because of the lighting changing the color. Okay, after a few rounds of loosing the chance to cap we get the numbers and then we find out that shadowed yellow also picks up the tan in the volunteer's shirts... by the time we figured all of this out we had no real time to actually DO the capping...

[Quatitos]

Originally Posted by team66t-money

in the first match of our division finals the announcer for curie had green hair and pretty much an all green shirt on our camera was programmed to find all shades of the vision green because the lights going on and off changes but anyways my team asked him politely to move until autonomous mode was over, he did move but not far enough the camera picked him up drove forward turned to him and pretty much tried attacking him, we had so much power behind our robot that it slammed into the side and finally our manipulator flipped up over the side and snapped the steel cable for our arm then the ref wanted to give us a penalty for slamming other robots when they come after us first.

I got to personally witness this event from about 10 feet away and when I saw 66 slam into the wall I knew that something must have gone wrong. After the match I heard from one of our mentors what had happened and I felt really bad that this had to happen to you guys during the finals. You had an awesome bot and a great autonomous. Its too bad you had to have it happen then but the only thing you can do with the situation is to try and learn from it and get even better, which I am positive that you guys will pull off.

[Dave Flowerday]

Originally Posted by team66t-money

But for some reason FIRST did not ban green from the game our anywhere around it, i think that because they did not do this they pretty much ripped our chance of making it farther in the finals in our division and maybe further in the championship.

I'm sorry to hear that the setup around the field caused you trouble, but the situation you encountered was an issue that could have been anticipated and solved by your team. Even if the announcer had not been wearing green, there could have easily been green being worn by people in the stands, or by other team members standing near the field, or even other robots painted green.

[Phil 33]

I was watching that match from the side of the field. It was very unfortunate. However, I have to ask you one question: when it was clear something was wrong with your autonomous mode, why didn't your human player step off the pad and disable your robot?

next year if FIRST uses the camera our in the future they need to ban that certain color from around the field because it could really hurt another team our it just might get some one hurt. so please go to first and let them know something must be done not to let this happen again

I don't think it's fair to blame FIRST for this, nor do I think FIRST should have banned the color green around the field. They gave teams a very nice "out" this year by allowing them to disable their robots by having a human player step off the pad. Again, what happened in that match was very unfortunate, and I'm not trying to sound ungracious or unprofessional, but I don't think FIRST did anything wrong by not banning the color green around the field.

[Wetzel]

Originally Posted by PURPLE!

Our program was so close... then the lighting on the field came up. Wow... talk about inconsistent. By the time the robot found the green it would go up then cast a shadow on it because of the lighting changing the color. Okay, after a few rounds of loosing the chance to cap we get the numbers and then we find out that shadowed yellow also picks up the tan in the volunteer's shirts... by the time we figured all of this out we had no real time to actually DO the capping...

You guys came the closest when the only other team in Archimedes tried to cap the center goal and your vision tetras collided. That was heartbreaking!

I commend you for your efforts with the vision system.

Wetzel

[ldeffenb]

Originally Posted by team66t-money

But for some reason FIRST did not ban green from the game our anywhere around it

Actually, had I known of your problem with green around the field, I'd have suggested our solution. We anticipated this based on something we read in the rules about distractions off of the field being our problem. We angled our camera so that it was staring at the floor about 3 feet in front of the robot. At that angle, the tetras and/or goal colors were still seen at the top (bottom in the T packets) of the camera's view. The color would have had to be inside the field wall or on the floor outside for us to see it. Hair would not have been a problem (unless your announcer, like Archimedes, did a head-stand on the field).

Can you tell me your match numbers? I'd like to download SOAP 108's videos of them to see you all in action.

You can download our videos from my BitTorrent server at http://ldeffenb.dnsalias.net:30049. Look for the ones dated for the Championships. if you prefer SOAP's videos, we were in matches 5 (which they don't have right), 24, 42, 57, 71, 80, and 89. Match 80 is the one to watch as we go head-to-head with 624 also trying for the vision cap. Their miss caused our miss. Such is life....

Lynn (D) - Team Voltage 386 Software and Coach

PS. BitTorrent clients can be found at www.BitTornado.com (Windoze) and www.BitTorrent.com (others).

PPS. The Tiki Trophy thread has a posting as to what caused our failure to cap. And we aren't blaming anyone on the field for any of it.

[Kit Gerhart]

Originally Posted by Phil 33

I was watching that match from the side of the field. It was very unfortunate. However, I have to ask you one question: when it was clear something was wrong with your autonomous mode, why didn't your human player step off the pad and disable your robot?

My guess is that the HP didn't step off the pad because they didn't want a 30 point penalty.

[Mike]

Although I agree with you to an extent, it was just another obstacle that you had to overcome.

[Biff]

As a television engineer I have worked with cameras for over 25 years. Glib comments about "it's just another item you have to work around" don't help. Our attempts at getting anything useful out of our camera system were utter failures.
I watched 66 at GLR I was impressed.
From reading the forums here they are one of only about 4 teams that had a camera system that worked at all. That's four teams out of about 1000. Other comments in the forums here lead me to believe that the numbers for calibrations were at best inconsistent.
Looking at the playing fields with the skills I have learned shading cameras lead me to conclude the only way to get a good set of calibration numbers was to put your robot out there and do it yourself. This was not accounted for.
In the rules, and question and answer system mentions about programming for interference from colored objects. It was also stated that deliberate color schemes and clothing that sole intent was to confuse the vision system were against the rules.
So bottom line hat's off to 66 and the other teams that went down the vision system road.
In my opinion the match should have been replayed as the announcers clothing, although maybe not deliberate, clearly interfered with a vision system.
Like last year First clearly had high hopes for some kind of robot vision. The teams that had the best luck with vision last year clearly limited what they used the IR system for.
Maybe in the future there can be time on the field set aside for Teams to do the calibrations for future vision systems. My suggestion would be lunch on Thursday, First come first serve.(Pun intended) After all whining with out offering a solution is not a GP thing to do.

[Steve W]

I was the announcer on Curie field. There was only one time that I was approached, it was during the playoffs. When I came over to your team to see how we could remedy the situation I was told that it was not me but a field reset crew member that had a green collar on his shirt. As the collar was the same color as the green tetra, I asked him to tuck it inside his T-shirt which he did immediately. The fact was that you did not even come out to play that game. I was also told by another member of your team later that you were locking onto the volunteer passes that they were wearing.

It seems that there was a little confusion on your team as to why your vision was not working. I do laud you for giving it a go but please don't attack others when you are not sure of why you had problems. If you ask anyone there, they would tell you that I would do whatever necessary to help teams and not be a hindrance. I WANT to see teams succeed.

[Dave Flowerday]

Originally Posted by Biff

Glib comments about "it's just another item you have to work around" don't help.

It's not a glib comment - other teams (mine included) anticipated this problem and successfully solved it. Perhaps I missed it, but I didn't see any questions on this forum of how to solve it or I would have explained what we do. Part of engineering is anticipating possible problems and incorporating solutions into the design. One suggestion was already made (point the camera at the ground). Our solution was to have the camera look only at the exact locations that tetras should have been found and use the virtual window function of the camera to further restrict it's view. We did not have a single problem with our vision system at the Championship. We successfully tracked the tetras and goals in every single match we played using the calibration values that FIRST provided. Since our software knew which spots the tetras were located in, we could intelligently decide which one to attempt to pick up, and in the cases where we knew that we couldn't pick up either of them (due to the robot's design and not having enough time) we instead would drive over to the autoloader so that it was ready to go when driver control started.

Other comments in the forums here lead me to believe that the numbers for calibrations were at best inconsistent. Looking at the playing fields with the skills I have learned shading cameras lead me to conclude the only way to get a good set of calibration numbers was to put your robot out there and do it yourself.

We used the provided numbers at the regionals and Championship and they worked perfectly. I remember hearing after Week 1 regionals that some teams had trouble with the numbers, but I haven't really heard anything like that since. Did other teams have trouble with the numbers in Atlanta?

It was also stated that deliberate color schemes and clothing that sole intent was to confuse the vision system were against the rules.
... In my opinion the match should have been replayed as the announcers clothing, although maybe not deliberate, clearly interfered with a vision system.

Are you suggesting that the announcer was deliberately trying to confuse the camera with his clothing? I'm sure you're not, but FIRST made it clear that they would not go so far as to restrict people from wearing green or anything like that.

[Jack Jones]

Originally Posted by team66t-money

…. in the first match of our division finals the announcer for curie had green hair and pretty much an all green shirt on our camera was programmed to find all shades of the vision green because the lights going on and off changes but anyways my team asked him politely to move until autonomous mode was over, he did move but not far enough the camera picked him up drove forward turned to him and pretty much tried attacking him, …

That’s not the way I heard or saw it. I was the ref on scorer’s side Blue end. After 66 slammed the wall late in the Qs, we removed anything green from the table behind me - that’s where the robot aimed, right at me, not at Steve. It did no good. The robot came my way again. We then thought it was the green shirt on the auto load attendant and asked him to vacate next time during autonomous. A short time later the head ref told me that 66 had feedback showing that their video targeted my badge (maybe in concert with my hanging Thunder Chicken). That made perfect sense; it always works to blame the ref.

The odds of capping the center goal with a vision tetra were slim to none. As evidenced by that fact that nobody pulled it off. If we re-played every match that went without success, we’d still be trying to finish up the regionals.

[the_short1]

i honestly think team 66 coulda been a STRONG contender in the finals.. you guys seriously are one of my top 5 teams ! . . team 1596 felt your pain when your cable broke.. as it happened to us at GLR (our third match), and recabling it not a fast easy thing (am i right or what!),,

also wasnl;t the yellow/black caution tape giving you guys problems? .. i think that first did not do enuf this year for those colors.. in autonomous i think all should clear away with those colors..!

GO TEAM 66! hope to see you guys again at great lakes next year as you guys are AWSOME!~ and hopefully we can add to that 66:67 alliance !