|
|
|
 Isn't that what we do here? It seems like no 'controversial' thread is complete until everyone gets a say. - kjohnson [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| Isn't that what we do here? It seems like no 'controversial' thread is complete until everyone gets a say. - kjohnson [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#4
03-01-2007, 17:07
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: Modular Sub-Processing
I think it would be prudent to put a big warning in this document that the device you describe is illegal for use in a FIRST competition.
*Well, we don't know for certain that it is illegal this year, but I'd be willing to bet money on it. It is a safety issue, plain and simple, to have a custom circuit device "in between" the RC's PWM output and the speed controller. It will totally defeat IFI's robot disable functionality. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Critique my image processing program... | Salik Syed | Programming | 13 | 29-06-2006 16:57 |
| Outsourcing Processing/Storage | Mike | Chit-Chat | 0 | 26-06-2005 21:06 |
| Processing pre-set Interrupts | Tom Bottiglieri | Programming | 1 | 13-02-2005 15:41 |
| Processing data quickly in autonomous | jgannon | Programming | 4 | 04-01-2005 14:45 |
| Parallel processing for 3dmax | mnkysp6353 | General Forum | 9 | 06-05-2004 10:26 |
Threaded Mode