|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Team #8's Robot Cad
i like the grabbers that actually squinch the tube, rather than a grabber. why couldn't 996 think of this?? -cries-
nice design, which regional are you guys going to? we might be able to see y'all if you happened to mosey on down to the phoenix regionals. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Team #8's Robot Cad
We won't be in Phoenix, sorry. We'll be at Silicone Valley and maybe Vegas.
-Guy |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team #8's Robot Cad
i think the design is great. it looks very simple, "keep it simple stupid" , and the crabber looks like it has potential. I've seen people trying to design grabbers with like 5 pivot points and moving parts, too much.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team #8's Robot Cad
How much does that manipulator weigh? It looks pretty beefy and even more so if you do plan on driving the rollers in specific ways to rotate the tubes and all that.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Team #8's Robot Cad
Can you only score on the top row? Just wondering, because it seems like it would be hard to release the inner tubes on the lower spider legs with that roller grabbing mechanism...
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Team #8's Robot Cad
It's going to score on the top row, one way or another. We're still not sure how heavy it is, I'll let you know when we find out.
-Guy |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Team #8's Tube Interface | dfukuba | Extra Discussion | 5 | 13-01-2007 02:04 |
| pic: Team #8's Tube Interface | dfukuba | Extra Discussion | 13 | 13-01-2007 01:16 |
| pic: Team 948 2-Speed Ball-Shifting Gearbox CAD Drawing | jfelser | Extra Discussion | 24 | 18-12-2006 21:18 |
| pic: Team 759 CAD pic (almost finished) | oljomo | Extra Discussion | 6 | 01-03-2005 16:31 |
| pic: Team 356...Full CAD model | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 2 | 04-03-2004 08:08 |