Go to Post I've found that housework is more fun with power tools. - RogerR [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Motors
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-02-2007, 17:16
Joe Johnson's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Joe Johnson Joe Johnson is online now
Engineer at Medrobotics
AKA: Dr. Joe
FRC #0088 (TJ2)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: May 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Raynham, MA
Posts: 2,631
Joe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond reputeJoe Johnson has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Banebots 36mm gearbox: Recommendations for use

UPDATE:
I have finally had a spare minute from the 56mm DD issue to get some time to actually evaluate my prediction with respect to the 36mm gearbox.

As you know from above, I recommended that teams that use the Banebot motor, keep the ratio below 55:1, much lower with impact loads.

I am in the middle of my test but I have enough to give a prelimary update.

Used the 64:1 kit transmission for theses test.

Preliminarily, used 6V and ran 50 +stall -stall cycles with the roto "locked" Actually I could not get a good lock on the output shaft so it rotated 5 deg or so.

The backlash in the joint opened up to about 10deg after these 50 cycle.

I repeated the test with 12V, again another 50 +stall -stall cycles (careful to stop when the motor gets hot and blow air on it for a bit).

The backlash in the joint opened up to about 15 deg after these 50 cycle.

I allowed the gearbox output shaft to now rotate about 20 deg or so and immediately stop -- a pretty rough test, because it is enough freeplay to let the motor reach full speed.

No noticeable increase in backlash.

I will continue the test tomorrow. But, I believe that the joint may be better than I had projected. There are lots of possible reasons. One may be that the materials are workharding with each impact.

This is encouraging results because I suppose even if I DO eventually get the gearbox to fail, it is not a 1 hit, boom and your done type failure but something that takes time. This will allow teams to do R&R after each match if needed.

There is a great quote from Raul-the-magnificent that I think about a lot, I don't have it exactly but the basic idea is this: "In FIRST, you can either have comfortable safety margins or you can have a competitive robot, you can't have both."

True dat.

Joe J.
__________________
Joseph M. Johnson, Ph.D., P.E.
Mentor
Team #88, TJ2
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange noises from the BaneBots gearbox/CIM combination. PhilBot Motors 5 15-01-2007 11:15
42 mm Banebots Gearbox Hunter Motors 9 13-01-2007 21:52
FirstCadLibrary Updated - 36mm Gearbox Ed Sparks Inventor 2 13-01-2007 17:16
36mm BaneBots Gearmotor Model Madison Inventor 5 10-01-2007 07:35
2007 BaneBots 52mm Gearbox is posted ! Ed Sparks Inventor 3 09-01-2007 07:38


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi