paper: 2007 Overall Team Rank by Regional Performances

[CJV648]

Nice spreadsheet, thanks for uploading all that work. Has anybody looked at using it to rate the quality of play at the different regionals? For example, 501 is ranked 2nd for its performance at one regional and 768th for its performance at another. Was this a matter of inconsistency of play of the team, a difference in difficulty of the regionals, inconsistent luck in the match draws, or some other factor I haven't considered?

[Swampdude]

I've added the rest of the regionals, and filled in the Championship divisions in Rev -C

[David]

Originally Posted by wilsonmw04

just a quick suggestion: figure out some way of weighting the elimiation wins more. I was just looking through the rankings. my team (2106) is ranked 490th (not complaining) while the winner of VCU (540) was ranked 709th. It looks like the QP's and seeds are given too much weight. I can't believe how much work went into this. Nicely done!

i don't think any notice was given to QP and RP if those were deciding factors my team would be about in the top 10 not 37

[65_Xero_Huskie]

Uhm, for the champs, I dont think a 4-4 record would have given us a 9th seed? Hehe. We were 6-1 during the championship seedings.