|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Dual Wheel Swerve-Drive
Not having any chain is a part of it. Removing the chain also makes the modules much shorter, which decreases the side loads on the axels. This eliminates the need for a delrin bearing at the bottom of each module.
That’s why I want to make them narrower. My reasoning is that if I make them narrow enough (say 3") I won't have to do any dragging at all - It'll be just like having four wheels - but with a groove in the middle of each one! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: Coaxial Swerve drive, lightened. | CraigHickman | Extra Discussion | 19 | 06-22-2006 03:00 PM |
| pic: Dual omni-wheel | Richard Wallace | Extra Discussion | 17 | 12-05-2005 10:38 AM |
| pic: Chantilly Academy's 4 Wheel Drive 4 Wheel Steering!!!! | jskene | Robot Showcase | 25 | 02-18-2005 08:24 PM |
| White Paper Discuss: Dual-motor, dual-speed drive transmission design | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 9 | 09-03-2003 10:40 AM |
| pic: Lego Swerve Drive | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 14 | 06-26-2003 04:19 PM |