|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
KOP transmissions: Your turn.
I've been looking over a lot of threads, new and old. And I've noticed one constant: Complaints about the KOP transmissions. I'm personally of the camp to design my own more complex transmission, but I had a brain fart: If you all dislike the KOP transmission, would any of you be willing to step up and design a gearbox that could be used by all the teams? It would have to be low cost, decently low weight, and durable. I'll design one just for kicks and giggles, but would any of the myriad of complainers be willing to back their complaints with action?
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Been done.
Frame designed by JVN, transmissions by Paul Copioli. (Granted, the kit transmissions of that era weren't the lightest things around--but they held together, and you could take weight out of them.) |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
No need to design one. Anyone looking to fabricate their own isn't going to be able to do so for less than $98--AM Single Speed
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Quote:
Seriously now.... $98 is a steal for those, it'd be awesome if FIRST put them in the kit (for both teams and for Andy Baker/Mark Koors). My only gripe is that they only facemount (which will probably only mess with new teams.... for some reason it feels really wrong to have a complaint about something Andy designed); but that's nothing compared to the rest. EDIT: very true Cory (below). A lot of times problems are easier than I imagine. Last edited by AdamHeard : 28-08-2007 at 14:51. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Talking about transmissions you could buy wasn't really the point, or I might have titled the thread "Best store-bought alternatives to the KOP transmissions."
|
|
#7
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
For those of you that care about such things, here are some little known factoids about the KOP transmissions of 2005 - 2006:
1. Designed by Paul Copioli and JVN. 2. Design, prototyping, testing completed by Paul Copioli and Giovanni Copioli (4 years old at the time) was 100% donated time. 3. The gears inside the transmision were manufactured by AndyMark. I think the motor shafts were too. 4. The die cast aluminum housing source was found by AndyMark. 5. The cost of the gearbox without the motors and bearings was around $30. The bearings were donated in 2005 and 2006. 6. The gears were not lightened due to cost, but teams could easily do it themselves. 7. The gearbox was designed for back to back operation. the 2 gearboxes could be stacked to create an arm gearbox capable of a ratio of 163:1. The gearbox was designed to take this load. Anyway, that's all I have for now. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Quote:
EDIT: Interesting information there Paul. The AM single speed has the exact same gears, right? how hard would it be to do the back to back with two Single speeds? EDIT2: dtengineering... Team 33 put out an excellent package for their shifter with a complete itemized parts list and a total cost, very useful. The banebots are semi reliable now... but compare how much torque one of those can take before destroying itself to the AM single/Old KOP.... The safety factor in those two make it so you'll never, ever have to worry about them. I love the idea for an arm gearbox that could take small/Big CIM, FP and globe... Last edited by AdamHeard : 28-08-2007 at 17:35. |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
There are some excellent papers on transmission designs in the White Papers here on CD. Teams have been very generous in sharing their ideas.
Perhaps one of the things that would be most helpful to teams wanting to build a transmission -- either based on one of these designs or a new one as proposed -- would be a list of components hyperlinked to on-line suppliers. One of the real tricks to building a competitive robot is knowing what parts are available, how much they cost, what their strengths and weaknesses are and where to get them from. That said, there is still room for innovation and collaboration. An arm transmission integrated with a sensor and PID feedback loop to hold position would be helpful to many teams, I think. As for the Banebots trannies, yes, there was a lot of concern about them before they received the carrier plate upgrades. Since then they have been at least as reliable as any other transmission. They are ideally suited for direct drive applications, which allows teams to do away with heavy and unreliable drive chains, and are very well designed for adding a very functionional optical encoder for speed and distance measurements. Jason P.S. Of course just because there is are existing solutions to a problem does not mean there aren't better ones. |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Quote:
Surely there must be someone who would like to see the FRC KoP include shifting transmissions you can just bolt on. |
|
#11
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Quote:
Also, with the AM shifters, any team that wants a bolt on trans can have it. Or, with a little more work, the dewalts can do that as well (Those are clamp on.... but close enough). |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Quote:
This is particularly true since the KOP transmissions are primarily used by teams who a) don't have the resources to make their own custom drive system, or b) use it because they want something that will run in a day or two out of the box. In both instances, a custom designed transmission that the plans are available is not desirable. Team A cannot make one, because they do not have the resources to do so. Team B will not make one, because it will divert their efforts from their subsystems. In either case, my answer remains the same. For a single speed kitbot drive, I highly, highly doubt you could possibly find a more economical solution than the AM single speed. Consider that in the Bay Area, a machine shop will charge you between $100-120 an hour to make parts for you. It would take at least 10-15 hours to machine two transmissions. Possibly more. That's $1500. Materials are probably another $100 or so. The kicker is that if you for some reason did want to make one yourself, just download the CAD files from Andymark and machine the parts yourself. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
The 05-06 KOP transmission was amazing, by FAR the best KOP transmission, and, IMO, better than the AM single speed (due to the arm configuration and longer output shaft). The only thing I can think of that would be a nice addition is adapter plates so you do not have to modify the transmission to use other motors with it.
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
The 05-06 season was my first year and I didnt work on mechanical but we never had any issues with them and they worked great. If they still sold them I would definitely pick a few.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: KOP transmissions: Your turn.
Or how about c) decide that the KOP tranny is the best one for their application? At least one of the 2005 champions decided that the kit trannies would provide what they wanted (strong, cheap, good gear ratio, easy maintenance) and went for it. Then in 2007, they decided to use an AndyMark 2-speed for the same reason--they knew it would provide what they wanted.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 06-05 KOP Transmissions Legal? | Dan Richardson | Rules/Strategy | 7 | 06-04-2007 07:20 |
| KOP Gyro seems to run-on after turn stops | PhilBot | Control System | 8 | 05-03-2007 12:43 |
| Organizing your KOP | blue_crew | Kit & Additional Hardware | 9 | 02-01-2006 19:36 |
| Turn 90 Degrees | Mike | Math and Science | 16 | 05-12-2004 22:22 |
| turn in time | moogie | 3D Animation and Competition | 1 | 18-02-2002 22:32 |