|
|
|
 If you have a problem with a team, go to that team and address it with them. Don't air your slanderous opinions here for all to see. - Andy Baker [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| If you have a problem with a team, go to that team and address it with them. Don't air your slanderous opinions here for all to see. - Andy Baker [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
09-19-2007, 01:22 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: AM Mecanum Chain Drive
What made you opt to link an AM single speed via chain rather than direct driving (or reducing) a Banebots transmission, which seems like it could be a cheaper, lighter, and more compact (in 2 of the 3 dimensions) solution. Don't really see the need to torque up a mecanum system, especially on a promobot.
Although I do very much like how well the system fits together (with the AM tucked in the frame and the CIM poking over the top), and I also like the use of channel (i-beam?) for the frame railing. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chain drive vs. cogged belt drive(timing belts) | LordBritten | Technical Discussion | 24 | 12-20-2006 11:07 PM |
| pic: Jester Drive:Mecanum Wheel Drive Train | Ken Delaney 357 | Technical Discussion | 64 | 03-29-2006 10:16 PM |
| Chain Drive chain | Damelvin | 3D Animation and Competition | 2 | 02-15-2005 12:19 AM |
| Chain Drive Question | Matt_Kaplan1902 | Technical Discussion | 34 | 04-12-2004 02:21 PM |
| Direct drive or Chain? | Suneet | Technical Discussion | 32 | 03-27-2003 11:00 PM |
Threaded Mode