|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Quad Quandary Stratigies
Having run through the video a few times, I believe a winning alliance will need two kinds of robots: one fast ringer capable of filling up the paired goals' posts as fast as possible, and a not-necessarily-as-fast enforcer capable of maintaining goal control. (An enforcer could be tasked with other things, such as descoring, but I'd mainly have it focus on keeping those goals safe.)
Of course, every team in FTC should be asking the magic question: "What would Simbotics do?" (Yes, this is a direct rip of Professor Grady's wisdom--but I don't think the comparison is unfounded.) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| //FIRST// FTC 2007 Game Challenge Revealed - Quad Quandary! | Mark McLeod | FIRST Tech Challenge | 3 | 23-09-2007 16:01 |
| Defensive Strategies | Goldeye | Rules/Strategy | 48 | 31-01-2006 19:16 |
| The Quad @ BUZZ U. is now online! | archiver | 2000 | 0 | 23-06-2002 23:14 |
| Best Strategies | Rick Gibbs | Regional Competitions | 15 | 12-03-2002 09:23 |
| Quad- 1/2 track drive system | Ben Mitchell | Technical Discussion | 24 | 30-01-2002 11:55 |