|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
I am using 2 cims into a custom gearbox per side. It is a single speed transmission. Also the best way to get sprockets to match hex is to buy plain dore sprockets and broach them into a hex. Hex stock shaft is very cheap and can be bought at mcmaster.
|
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
However, 7068/7075 hex shafts that some teams are using have to be custom made.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
Is 7068 or 7075 really necessary for a hex shaft that is short in length and supported on both ends. I would think that it would be plenty strong enough since you dont have to worry about a keyway.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
I really doubt 6061 hex shaft would hold up in that situation; I haven't run the numbers, but I doubt it would work well in a place like the shafts in a drive.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
In the picture above, of the module with a blue wheel, I was wondering how those sprockets drive the shafts. It doesn't look too me like they're hex, or keyed.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
Right behind that snapring you see is a 1/2" hex followed by a step of 1/2" round for a bearings then it steps down to 3/8" hex for the wheel then at the very end it turns into 3/8" round for another bearing and snapring.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
Well, my team doesn't have the machining capabilities to make a shaft like that, however, I thought about it and I think I've found a simpler solution in terms of machining. Instead of lathing anything on the hex shaft, we would use a 3/8" shaft all the way through, and where we needed bearings (on either side of the module) we would make a sort of bushing whose inside would be broached to a 3/8" hex, and whose outside would be a 5/8" dia. circle. This way we could put a hex shaft through the center and use a 5/8" bearing around the outside, and snap-rings to hold it all in place.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module
That method would definitely work although bigger bearings are more expensive and its heavier but if thats how you have to do it then by all means use that method. It will definitely work and would be less labor intensive.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 1625's swerve module (better pic) | Aren_Hill | Extra Discussion | 25 | 22-07-2008 19:14 |
| pic: FRC 1771 Swerve | sdcantrell56 | Extra Discussion | 5 | 10-04-2008 16:17 |
| pic: Team 148 Robowranglers: Swerve Module and Motors | Brandon Martus | Robot Showcase | 27 | 24-02-2008 22:29 |
| pic: stangs swerve module | Aren_Hill | Extra Discussion | 8 | 23-04-2007 08:15 |
| pic: Swerve! (Module) | =Martin=Taylor= | Extra Discussion | 13 | 09-07-2006 19:57 |