|
|
|
| I'd take a spoiler for you any day. |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2008 Team 1114 Championship Database
Well, those scores are really nice and the table and database have a great quality.
Still, I think you should be careful with the conclusions from the database about the teams. If you have a look at our scores, for example. The scores for the Seattle Regional are lower for us than for the Portland Regional. Even though, our team was 5-2-0 in the qualification rounds in Portland, we didn't play 3 of those matches due to technical issues! In contrast, in Seattle, we were quite dominating, scoring a lot of points and ending up as an alliance-captain and finally as the winner of the regional. During the tournament we didn't break down. In the finals we had a large contribution and didn't lose any game. We greatly improved between those two regionals (teams that saw both regionals will tell you that), but the database does not really reflect that. This is again caused by the OPR that are not reflecting at all what percentage of scoring a team does and closer data about the team itself. I think our scouting system gives us more, and detailed information about the teams themself, even though it needs more time to be evaluated... I am just saying that our team is a good example of the disadvantages for these kinds of statistics Chris Team 1983 - The Skunkworks Last edited by Chris Herold : 12-04-2008 at 17:59. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The tool itself is awesome but should only supplement strategy and scouting meetings along with your own up-to-date data from scouting in your division. Great job once again Karthik. ![]() |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: paper: 2008 Team 1114 Championship Database
Quote:
These stats are definitely a better gauge of a teams performance than believing what a team says about there own performance. You said that in Portland you were scoring a lot of points in qualifying, yet your average alliance score was 30.5. Based on this information, I would say your statement was a little optimistic. I don't blame you for it, everyone does it. It's just an example of why we like to use numbers. It is possible that I am wrong here and you put up 30+ points every match and your partners were taking penalties. If that is the case, I guarantee that our scouts and many others will take notice of you on Galileo. No matter what your OPR was on this spreadsheet. Good luck. We'll see you on the field. Last edited by Derek Bessette : 12-04-2008 at 21:50. Reason: bad speling |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: paper: 2008 Team 1114 Championship Database
great stuff
wish i heard about it before i compiled mad data off blue alliance for my division.. o well. anyone have any stats on penalties drawn by robots, or alliances? not gonna lie, i learn more about a team by how many points they lose, then score |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2008 Team 1511 Scouting Database | Larry Lewis | Scouting | 22 | 19-03-2008 19:21 |
| paper: Skunkworks, Team 1983,Robotics Business Plan, 2007 - 2008 | Bob Steele | Extra Discussion | 6 | 19-03-2008 18:28 |
| paper: 2007 Championship Event Scouting Database, presented by Team 1114 | Karthik | Extra Discussion | 18 | 10-04-2007 17:02 |
| paper: 2006 Niagara FIRST Public Championship Scouting Database | Karthik | Scouting | 17 | 20-04-2006 19:26 |
| White Paper Discuss: Karthik's 2005 Championship Scouting Database | Karthik | Extra Discussion | 33 | 11-04-2005 15:05 |