|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
Using 7075 or 7068 for the sideplates of a drivetrain is a total waste of money and complete overkill in my (not) so humble opinion. Tons of people have made similar designs with plain old 6061 and it works just fine.
It's always better to figure out why a design actually works and the best ways to implement it than to just assume upgrading to a "better" material will make everything work. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 6wd chassis
I completely agree with you cory. The only places where I see 7075 as having a noticeable impact on performance is on gears and shafts where strength is very important and there is a constant load working on the shaft. Adding flanges to the sideplates will increases the stiffness much more than just switching to 7075 aluminum. Also 7075 is very expensive stuff.
If anyone wants to see flanges, look at my last drivetrain I posted http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/32013? Last edited by sdcantrell56 : 10-11-2008 at 13:32. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: FRC1293 Prototype 6wd Chassis | Thermal | Extra Discussion | 16 | 06-01-2009 23:12 |
| 6WD Chassis Stiffness vs. Maneuverability | IKE | Technical Discussion | 35 | 07-12-2008 16:04 |
| pic: 6WD Design Iteration | Madison | Extra Discussion | 7 | 01-01-2008 14:00 |
| Need pictures of chassis for 6WD | team2061 | CAD | 6 | 24-12-2007 14:51 |
| pic: 6WD Module | Madison | Technical Discussion | 20 | 12-01-2007 10:09 |