pic: "You should never go against a robotics kid"

[Rick TYler]

RE: What it's called?

First of all, I call it "cool"!

Trebuchets were the ultimate development of the stationary flinging-arm military weapon, but by the 14th century they were being overtaken by early cannon. Since no one alive now speaks a 14th century dialect, we are unlikely to be using the proper name in 21st century English, especially since I doubt medieval siege engines used in probably dozens of different kingdoms, duchies, and counties were all called the same thing. I believe were are applying our modern passion for rigid definitions to devices created in a time where no such cladistic hegemony existed.

[Akash Rastogi]

Originally Posted by Rick TYler

RE: What it's called?

First of all, I call it "cool"!

Trebuchets were the ultimate development of the stationary flinging-arm military weapon, but by the 14th century they were being overtaken by early cannon. Since no one alive now speaks a 14th century dialect, we are unlikely to be using the proper name in 21st century English, especially since I doubt medieval siege engines used in probably dozens of different kingdoms, duchies, and counties were all called the same thing. I believe were are applying our modern passion for rigid definitions to devices created in a time where no such cladistic hegemony existed.

Not entirely sure but i believe the term was changed during the Mongolian rule of Central Asia... or at least the Khan or Seljuk Turks created a different type and changed the terms..

[BornaE]

doesn't a trebuchet have a mass one one side of its arm instead of surgical tubing?

[Eugene Fang]

Originally Posted by 0705920

doesn't a trebuchet have a mass one one side of its arm instead of surgical tubing?

Well, what people have been saying is that a trebuchet uses a weight and not a spring, so it sholud be called a catapult, but a catapult doesn't have a sling, so it should be a trebuchet.

let's just call it a "Catachet"

And the video should come soon, Bannanakin is (attempting to) upload it to Youtube.

[Dragonos]

I really hope that that CAD was not made in Inventor provided for FIRST....
(That may violate the EULA! Oh Noes!)
Sweet "Catachet" though!
Maybe our team should make an pneumatic catapult...

[Nuttyman54]

Originally Posted by Dragonos

I really hope that that CAD was not made in Inventor provided for FIRST....
(That may violate the EULA! Oh Noes!)
Sweet "Catachet" though!
Maybe our team should make an pneumatic catapult...

I don't believe that would violate the EULA for the FIRST provided inventor. I haven't used it in a few years, but IIRC it's simply the educational version which means that the only restriction is that you are not allowed to use it for any commercial products (ie anything you would be making money off of). This is clearly a non-commercial product.

[Eugene Fang]

Originally Posted by Dragonos

I really hope that that CAD was not made in Inventor provided for FIRST....
(That may violate the EULA! Oh Noes!)
Sweet "Catachet" though!
Maybe our team should make an pneumatic catapult...

The CAD was made using a student edition of SolidWorks.