|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1346 Side View 2009
Question for team 1346. Does your team feel that a six wheel robot will be better then at four wheel one for the game we will be playing? Also tell could you tell me why you guys came up with six wheels other then four.
Also could you tell us how well the robot turns. Team 3044 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: 1346 Side View 2009
Not sure how much more you have to do. But you can't be that far behind.
Since you've mounted the electronics: about how much do they add to the weight? My team thinks they will weigh 20 lbs. Is that outrageous? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1346 Side View 2009
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: 1346 Side View 2009
Nice looking robot !!!
We look forward to playing robots with you guys!! Our swerve came to life (finally) last night... and we shot the first balls from our mini-shooter last night also... so perhaps by this weekend we will have something to post... We are busy working on the swerve controls... By the way, last night we weighed our control board and it weighed 18 lbs..but it was on an 8 lb chunk of plywood (which we won't be using..) so it would appear to me that the control system (with 4 Jags) weighs in the neighborhood of 10 pounds wired... We are switching over to a hexcell board for mounting the electronics on the weekend.. This could be fun... well... actually it already is fun... Good luck!! We look forward to seeing your finished product on the field!! R |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1346 Side View 2009
Looking good, time to start (or continue) burning the midnight oil!
I think our electronics board weighs about 20 lbs, it's also a huge thick plywood box....sure is nice to work on, and so far we can afford the weight. |
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: 1346 Side View 2009
Quote:
As for the "why" part of the question, however, I will reference this thread http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=71238 and the white paper/spreadsheet referenced in it. This robot is, actually, a four wheel drive robot... as most 6wd designs actually are. In our case the front two wheels are 1/8" off the ground. This means that the wheel base is effectively the distance between the two rear axles, or about 13". By reducing the wheel base, and maximizing the width between the wheels we are maximizing our turning torque by reducing the amount of scrubbing that will occurr during turns. The two front wheels are there just to keep us from tipping forward and to help us get back up on the regolith from the carpet... if we run in to weight issues, we could probably get rid of the drive chain leading to them and, even, the front wheels themselves. Jason |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: 1346 Feb 4 2009 | dtengineering | Extra Discussion | 6 | 05-02-2009 09:49 |
| pic: Drivetrain Side View | AustinSchuh | Extra Discussion | 23 | 30-12-2006 03:41 |
| pic: Team 226 side view | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 8 | 25-02-2004 16:25 |
| pic: Team 271's Side View | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 1 | 17-03-2003 18:48 |
| pic: Right Side view | CD47-Bot | Robot Showcase | 2 | 03-03-2003 15:26 |