|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: paper: Belt vs. Chain Drive Evaluation - Team 234
Has either 234 or 612 (or any other team using belts on their drive train) used non-aluminum timing belt sprockets? Or more specifically, has anyone used the SDP/SI (or similar) timing belt sprockets that have an aluminum Fairloc/T-Insert hub embedded inside a polycarbonate timing belt sprocket on a FRC drive train?
I've been using some of these with 5mm pitch belt on the shooter (as shown below) and ball intake on 228's robot this year, and was considering them for the drive train in the future. They are a lot lighter than the aluminum ones (freeing up machining resources for more important things), and at high RPMs are noticeably quieter than roller chain (compared to our Aim High robot). ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Chain drive vs. cogged belt drive(timing belts) | LordBritten | Technical Discussion | 24 | 20-12-2006 23:07 |
| Chain or belt?? | JohnMorenski | General Forum | 6 | 19-12-2006 16:13 |
| White Paper Discuss: Team 234 - Cyber Blue - 2005 Chairmans Entry | Chris Fultz | Extra Discussion | 0 | 29-03-2005 19:02 |
| White Paper Discuss: Team 234 Cyber Blue Chairman's Submittal 2004 | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 1 | 19-04-2004 10:56 |