|
|
|
 I, for one, refused to be railroaded down this train of thought so easily! Geeze, one lousy game hint just builds up steam for any old picture to come through and go two pages in a matter of hours. - Billfred [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#10
02-03-2009, 19:34
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Team 2022's Drivebase
Wow, that is awfully insightful. I'm always a fan of bigger and more powerful but this year I think you've got the right idea. All of these other teams are spending their energy developing software to limit their beefy drivetrains, instead you avoid designing a beefy drivetrain in the first place.
The active traction control is still a disadvantage because in most cases, in order for it to activate, the wheels have to slip. Pushing the slip boundary like that makes it easier to push them if you're solidly in static friction. That picture also blows up nicely, but I don’t think we can see the bevel gears in the housing. Do you have any pictures from the assembly process? Kudos on a crazy cool design. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: EngiNERDs - Team 2337 - Team Work After Ball Popped | Clinton Bolinger | Extra Discussion | 3 | 23-02-2008 23:10 |
| pic: Dawgma 1712 NEW and IMPROVED Drivebase | Chuck Glick | Extra Discussion | 4 | 13-01-2008 15:30 |
| pic: Team RoboRaiders(75) and Team Mu Mu Psi(2016) versions 2007 | Rohith Surampudi | Robot Showcase | 5 | 22-02-2007 08:43 |
| Team 1425 Drivebase and Wiring | Sparks333 | Robot Showcase | 5 | 05-02-2007 10:41 |
| pic: Team 334 Team Members after the CeBit Convention | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 2 | 29-05-2004 14:14 |
Threaded Mode