pic: FRC-34 2009 Swerve Module w/CIM (Front View)

Aren_Hill · #1 04-05-2009, 18:21

The whole reason I went coaxial was so the programmers couldn't break the drivetrain by spinning too far lol
with coaxial they can send whatever commands they want at it and all that would happen would be a bunch of random spinning at worst

AdamHeard · #2 04-05-2009, 18:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aren_Hill

The whole reason I went coaxial was so the programmers couldn't break the drivetrain by spinning too far lol
with coaxial they can send whatever commands they want at it and all that would happen would be a bunch of random spinning at worst

yup, can't trust those programmers

sgreco · #3 05-05-2009, 07:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdamHeard

yup, can't trust those programmers

Oh, those silly programmers...It's always a code problem

But then again, without code, the robot is just a door stop...

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
pic: FRC-34 2009 Swerve Module w/FP (Side View)	Ed Sparks	Extra Discussion	6	09-03-2009 14:02
pic: FRC-34 2009 Frame Concept (Bottom View)	Ed Sparks	Extra Discussion	1	09-03-2009 12:11
pic: FRC-34 2009 Frame Concept (Rear View)	Ed Sparks	Extra Discussion	2	09-03-2009 11:00
pic: FRC 1771 Swerve Module	sdcantrell56	Extra Discussion	17	13-04-2008 00:36