|
|
|
 You've got to love the great connection between FIRST teams, and their members. - zakk [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| You've got to love the great connection between FIRST teams, and their members. - zakk [more] |
|
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#8
14-06-2009, 20:05
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Swerve Module Concept (View 1)
It would. I have tried to make the module as short as possible to reduce the length of the arm that would be applying force to the frame. It is my belief that worst case scenario would be being pushed when the wheels are facing perpendicular to the direction of the pushing. My biggest concern was breaking the wheel or bending the casing. To address this problem I chose to use the AM traction wheels with a custom hub, and use pocketing to reduce as much weight instead of cutting through the entire wall.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| pic: FRC-34 2009 Swerve Module w/CIM (Front View) | Ed Sparks | Extra Discussion | 10 | 05-05-2009 07:13 |
| pic: FRC-34 2009 Swerve Module w/FP (Side View) | Ed Sparks | Extra Discussion | 6 | 09-03-2009 14:02 |
| pic: stangs swerve module | Aren_Hill | Extra Discussion | 8 | 23-04-2007 08:15 |
| pic: Swerve! (Module) | =Martin=Taylor= | Extra Discussion | 13 | 09-07-2006 19:57 |
Threaded Mode