Go to Post I think we need a little more humour injected into topics such as these to diffuse whatever tension has been created by the original discussion threads. - Travis Hoffman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-22-2010, 07:18 PM
Travis Hoffman's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Travis Hoffman Travis Hoffman is offline
O-H
FRC #0048 (Delphi E.L.I.T.E.)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Warren, Ohio USA
Posts: 4,044
Travis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Hoffman has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by hipsterjr View Post
My, that frame looks familar
Indeed....
__________________

Travis Hoffman, Enginerd, FRC Team 48 Delphi E.L.I.T.E.
Encouraging Learning in Technology and Engineering - www.delphielite.com
NEOFRA - Northeast Ohio FIRST Robotics Alliance - www.neofra.com
NEOFRA / Delphi E.L.I.T.E. FLL Regional Partner
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-23-2010, 03:06 AM
Valkyries_698's Avatar
Valkyries_698 Valkyries_698 is offline
Palmam qui meruit ferat
AKA: Tim
FRC #0698 (Microbots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 42
Valkyries_698 is a jewel in the roughValkyries_698 is a jewel in the roughValkyries_698 is a jewel in the roughValkyries_698 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to Valkyries_698
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

we are doing something similar but with a slick wheel at the front,

We have been researching a system called Rocker-bogie


Last edited by Valkyries_698 : 01-23-2010 at 03:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-23-2010, 06:20 PM
fordchrist675's Avatar
fordchrist675 fordchrist675 is offline
"Wilfordito"
AKA: Wilford Jay Harris III
FRC #0675 (Technology High School Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Rohnert Park, California
Posts: 298
fordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to allfordchrist675 is a name known to all
Send a message via AIM to fordchrist675 Send a message via MSN to fordchrist675 Send a message via Yahoo to fordchrist675
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

I think you should ship the robot as is! I am sold on the wood chassis haha!

Looks like a ingenious idea.
__________________
It's not by how much you win, it's how you win. Respect your enemies, otherwise your no better than them which if you think about it that's true because we are striving for the same thing. To be FIRST

2010 SVR Creativity Award
2010 SVR Regional Finalists
2010 SAC Innovation in Control Award
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-23-2010, 07:12 PM
hyperdude's Avatar
hyperdude hyperdude is offline
Techie.
AKA: Mike W.
FRC #2503 (Warrior Robotics)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 67
hyperdude has a spectacular aura abouthyperdude has a spectacular aura abouthyperdude has a spectacular aura about
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valkyries_698 View Post
we are doing something similar but with a slick wheel at the front,

We have been researching a system called Rocker-bogie

Mars rovers, right? Funny thing, I came up with something almost exactly the same (prototype design).
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-23-2010, 07:15 PM
CraigHickman
 
Posts: n/a
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by hyperdude View Post
Mars rovers, right? Funny thing, I came up with something almost exactly the same (prototype design).
Tanks have been using a Rocker Bogie system since long before the rovers. Go take a look at the old Shermans, those are neat pieces of rolling coffins!
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-23-2010, 07:42 PM
Valkyries_698's Avatar
Valkyries_698 Valkyries_698 is offline
Palmam qui meruit ferat
AKA: Tim
FRC #0698 (Microbots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 42
Valkyries_698 is a jewel in the roughValkyries_698 is a jewel in the roughValkyries_698 is a jewel in the roughValkyries_698 is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to Valkyries_698
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigHickman View Post
Tanks have been using a Rocker Bogie system since long before the rovers. Go take a look at the old Shermans, those are neat pieces of rolling coffins!


well this rocker-bogie was worked on by someone that is on the game design team
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-24-2010, 05:48 PM
Raul's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Raul Raul is offline
Somewhat Useful Person
no team (Formerly - Wildstang)
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Greenville, TX
Posts: 599
Raul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond reputeRaul has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

I believe the main advantage to articulating the wheel pods is to maintain a more level chassis while going over the bump.

Look at the wooden model in the picture Jason provided. If the rear wheel pods are articulated (rotated) so that only the rear-most wheels are touching, the angle of the main frame will be at a lesser incline and provide a greater safety factor to prevent the center of mass from getting close to the tipping point.
__________________
Warning: this reply is just an approximation of what I meant to convey - engineers cannot possibly use just written words to express what they are thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-24-2010, 09:01 PM
JesseK's Avatar
JesseK JesseK is offline
Expert Flybot Crasher
FRC #1885 (ILITE)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 3,608
JesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond reputeJesseK has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raul View Post
I believe the main advantage to articulating the wheel pods is to maintain a more level chassis while going over the bump.

Look at the wooden model in the picture Jason provided. If the rear wheel pods are articulated (rotated) so that only the rear-most wheels are touching, the angle of the main frame will be at a lesser incline and provide a greater safety factor to prevent the center of mass from getting close to the tipping point.
Interesting point, especially considering that the bumper zone rules aren't as strict while on the bump. Our primary goal with the conforming articulation (not sure what to specifically call it) was simply to maintain a controlled climb, peak, and descent. Doing so, we believe, will reduce the risk of tipping over. If anything, the heightened clearance requirements of this natural articulation may elevate the c.g., yet we are doing some very careful calculations (one of the mentors understands them ... I don't, heh...) to ensure we're under the tipping threshold.

For those interested, the actual drive train weighs in at 45lbs. Yet that's also with a subframe capable of withstanding some pretty high stresses due to high tension. We feel the extra weight is a good trade-off for stability & reliability.
__________________

Drive Coach, 1885 (2007-present)
CAD Library Updated 5/1/16 - 2016 Curie/Carver Industrial Design Winner
GitHub
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-29-2010, 01:23 AM
waghalter's Avatar
waghalter waghalter is offline
Registered User
FRC #0698
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3
waghalter is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

jesseK is right,

as the student leader of the design team building this, along with our mentor's help, we found that the pivot has some extremely strong forces acting on it. the potential for the pivot axel to get bent or damaged is high if the robot's design does not build in enough support to stiffin the axel.

so please consider this if you are doing a similar design. best wishes team 698. Good luck !
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-29-2010, 12:58 PM
Daniel_LaFleur's Avatar
Daniel_LaFleur Daniel_LaFleur is offline
Mad Scientist
AKA: Me
FRC #2040 (DERT)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 1,945
Daniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond reputeDaniel_LaFleur has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via MSN to Daniel_LaFleur
Re: pic: 1885 Drive Train 2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
A word of caution. If, during a pushing match etc, the torque of your wheels causes them to rotate the assembly and lift your bot up an inch or two, your bumpers will be out of the legal zone. This may be deemed illegal and you may be DSQ'd (if someone decides to protest). You may want to look at some sort of active actuation to prevent it.
Incorrect. The bumperzone is defined with your wheels touching the ground.

If you are pushed in such a way that your wheels are not touching the ground (like being pushed up a ramp) then the bumperzone no longer applies.

If it were as you stated, then any time a robot went over the bump they would gather a penalty.
__________________
___________________
"We are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. "
- Tennyson, Ulysses
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drive Train Components: the inner working parts of a drive train naruto137 Technical Discussion 3 12-10-2008 09:14 PM
pic: Jester Drive:Mecanum Wheel Drive Train Ken Delaney 357 Technical Discussion 64 03-29-2006 10:16 PM
pic: 1493 Drive Train 1 Dan-o Robot Showcase 15 02-17-2005 02:59 PM
pic: 350 drive train CD47-Bot Robot Showcase 4 02-16-2004 12:05 AM
pic: 311's Drive Train CD47-Bot Robot Showcase 2 02-24-2003 06:09 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 AM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi