|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Great idea. I will be interested in what the GDC rules.
You could put a grommet in the flap on each side and have a bolt that goes through the grommet to hold it in place. |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
What a great idea. I hope this gets approved.
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Genius. Love it.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
That's a very elegant solution. I love it.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
hope they approve this it is a great idea
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Thanks for the feedback. We'll probably back up the velcro with grommets or something similar. The only downside I can think of is it coming loose and leaving the bumper zone.
I haven't been able to post this to Q&A yet (I need to get our login information), but feel free to use my picture and ask them yourself. |
|
#7
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that while this is an ingenious idea, it probably won't be approved. Quoting <R12>, "Therefore, each ROBOT must be able to display red BUMPERS and blue BUMPERS This may be done via either of two acceptable methods:" and then it goes on to list the methods.
What they don't say is if any other method is acceptable. That's what I'd ask. If I had Q&A access, I would say something like: "We have found another method to change bumper color. We would like to know if we are allowed to use this method. [describe method] If this is not legal, we would also like to know which rule it specifically violates." Like I say, I'm not sure this method would go through, but I'd love it if it did. I'd also use the grommet attachment suggested. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Has anyone posted this on the Q&A yet? I am my team's Q&A guy, so I will gladly do it if the OP has yet to gain access to the Q&A. I would actually just copy the picture and use Eric's question format.
lol -Rion |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Go ahead, that would be appreciated. Eric's phrasing of the question sounds good.
|
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
I really like this idea, you guys are good! The Q&A has the final say on this though as to whether it satisfies R12. I wonder why someone didn't think of this before.
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
I hope this get's approved, if it does this could save a LOT of teams (mine included) from having to make 2 sets of bumpers or a bumper cover that could potentially fall off!
Can't wait to see the GDC feedback on this one! ![]() |
|
#12
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Innovation at its finest. Wonderful idea, and I also hope it gets approved.
![]() |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Not only is this ingenious, it also radically reduces the possibility of the secondary, or slip cover, color from hanging down and causing a penalty due to rough play.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: pic: Bumper idea - legal?
Quote:
-dave . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mechanism outside bumper - legal? | basicxman | Rules/Strategy | 13 | 13-01-2010 23:26 |
| Are these bumper configurations legal? | team3420 | Rules/Strategy | 8 | 12-01-2010 13:32 |
| pic: Legal Bumper Configuration? | AdamHeard | Extra Discussion | 31 | 15-01-2009 03:15 |
| What is a legal bumper? | lemon1324 | Technical Discussion | 10 | 26-01-2008 18:23 |