Do you like the seeding system?

[Koko Ed]

Originally Posted by Vector MycroftH

I agree KoKo Ed. "NO"

I understand that FIRST is attempting to make it so everyone wins . . . but in reality not everyone can. You fight and win ranking. Not lose for it.

So basically it's FIRST's version of No Child Left Behind. Because as my wife said if no one gets ahead no one gets left behind.

[Jim Meyer]

Where's the "It's too early to tell" button option? I don't think it's fair to judge it until after we see how it plays out in the 7 matches we usually get at nationals.

[JackG]

Originally Posted by Jim Meyer

Where's the "It's too early to tell" button option? I don't think it's fair to judge it until after we see how it plays out in the 7 matches we usually get at nationals.

The poll is set to close in 45 days, so you can vote even after Championships are over. You can vote anytime, so everyone can make up their own mind at their convenience.

[Rizner]

I (for the most part) like the new seeding system, but teams aren't using it correctly. There are strategies not utilized aside from scoring for your opponents and I'm surprised not many teams have played with them and how many jump straight to the idea to score for opponents. It could be a great system if used correctly, but sadly it isn't.