|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: paper: MARC 2010 Rule Changes
In the other MARC thread, Steve said the decision was made to stay with the standard seeding. W-T-L does not accurately rank teams any better than cooperition points. A 12-10 win should count more than a 2-0 win. The concern was whether to tweak the coopertition points or not, to avoid 6v0; make a 6-3 win better than a 0-22 loss. Other schemes could make 6v0 less beneficial, but not remove the advantage entirely; under certain situations it would always be better score for the opponents regardless of the seeding scheme. So it was decided to leave things as they were, after Team Update 16.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| MARC 2010 IS OPEN | Steve Ketron | General Forum | 142 | 30-06-2010 00:59 |
| MARC 2010 Update #3 | Steve Ketron | General Forum | 12 | 24-06-2010 13:44 |
| Rule change suggestions for MARC 2010 | GaryVoshol | General Forum | 50 | 17-05-2010 07:28 |
| paper: 2007 MARC Volunteer Needs Overview | KTorak | Extra Discussion | 3 | 03-05-2007 06:54 |
| Rule Changes? | archiver | 1999 | 6 | 23-06-2002 22:15 |