Go to Post A FIRST adage: You can make an Offensive robot play defense more effectively, than you can make a Defensive robot play offense. - Enigma's puzzle [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 07-10-2010, 14:31
Sh1ine Sh1ine is offline
Registered User
FRC #2791
Team Role: Leadership
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Albany NY
Posts: 96
Sh1ine is on a distinguished road
Re: pic: Belt Drive Chassis Take 2

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared341 View Post
With a toothed belt (or chain), I see problems arising when there are multiple, non-continuous contact patches with the pulley (like with the center wheel in the configuration shown).

For the sake of argument, say the top part of the belt is fully engaged with the teeth at the top of the center pulley. Clearly, you also want the other contact patch to be fully engaged with the teeth of the center pulley. Let's say your pully has 40 teeth, and 10 of them are engaged with the top of the belt. Then there are 10 unengaged teeth (the gap between where the belts contact the pulley), then 10 teeth engaged with the bottom of the belt. In this configuration, there must be an integer number of teeth in the belt between where it leaves the top of the center pulley and returns to the bottom (since there is an integer number of teeth on the pulley between the same two points*).

How do you ensure this? You either design for the exact right belt length, or you add adjustment to your system. You already have a tensioner, but, depending on belt pitch, you may need more than one dimension of adjustment in order to find both a belt length and belt tension that work. Failing that, I could see (best case) uneven loading of the belt and (worst case) belts skipping out of their pulleys.

I hope that all made sense.

* There could of course be, say, 9.5 teeth between contact patches, in which case the requirement generalizes to X.5 teeth in the belt, etc.
The other mentor is concerned about the same thing. I am not sure that I completely follow you however. I am under the impression that if a belt has a 5mm pitch it is only a matter of turning a pulley (also with a 5mm pitch) to the correct orientation. And if that pulley has a 5mm pitch then the belt should match at all points, regardless of the path in between. But who knows, you answer sounds a lot better then mine. I have never been much of a math wiz.

Have you experienced a issue like this or are you just making a well educated guess (theory)?
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pic: Belt Drive Chassis Sh1ine Extra Discussion 11 07-10-2010 07:11
pic: Schreiber Take on West Coast Drive Andrew Schreiber Extra Discussion 69 23-08-2010 00:36
pic: FRC488 - Six Wheel Drive Chassis Madison Technical Discussion 38 23-01-2007 10:58
Chain drive vs. cogged belt drive(timing belts) LordBritten Technical Discussion 24 20-12-2006 23:07
pic: Belt drive 1559 krADLEY Robot Showcase 8 01-02-2006 21:37


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi