|
|
|
 each year the chairmans award is given to the team the judges think deserve it the most, for that year. How can it be any other way? - KenWittlief [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you think the way the Elimination Rounds is scored is a poor decision? | |||
| YES |
  
|
23 | 37.70% |
| NO |
  
|
38 | 62.30% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Elimination Rounds-Impending Disaster?
Ok this is my only complaint with this year's game however it is a major one. The elimination rounds being the highest score out of two matches I believe is not the best way of determining who is the more deserving team. I don't see why we couldn't stick with the best two out of three. So basically what is happening now is two alliances evenly matched face off and because of a malfunctioned part for one game that allowed the other alliance to run "amok" and ring up the score moves another alliance on. Somebody please try to make some sort of reasoning with me on this because I'm failing to see how this system is justifible.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| More teams in the elimination rounds | DougHogg | General Forum | 16 | 27-04-2003 16:11 |
| Elimination Rounds | miketwalker | General Forum | 23 | 24-03-2003 15:06 |
| The Society for More Qualifying Rounds | archiver | 1999 | 47 | 23-06-2002 22:05 |
| What's the best qualifying rounds strategy? | Ken Leung | General Forum | 24 | 24-03-2002 18:25 |
| 4 practice rounds | Madison | Rules/Strategy | 2 | 08-01-2002 00:01 |
Threaded Mode