|
|
|
 Long Live FIRST! - IndySam [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
| View Poll Results: Should the maximum robot dimensions be... | |||
| Increased? |
  
|
7 | 9.46% |
| Decreased? |
  
|
12 | 16.22% |
| Unchanged? |
  
|
55 | 74.32% |
| Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
Smaller robots
Over the years, the FIRST robot sizes have been getting bigger and bigger. These larger sizes, although they do allow teams more freedom in designing their robot, have many negative aspects as well. Personally, I think FIRST would gain a lot if they decreased the robot sizes a bit... To somewhere about 50-75% of the current volume. I just think smaller machines are more impressive, it forces teams to be more clever and efficient in their designs, and we could cut the playing field size in half (that means teams could compete twice as much at regionals and nationals).
What do others think about robot sizes? - Patrick, having some crazy vision of tiny robots zipping around picking up and throwing Nerf footballs. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Whats your honest opinion? | Sean | General Forum | 50 | 17-04-2003 21:05 |
| FYI: FIRST Robots at the NYC Hall of Science | Rich Wong | General Forum | 9 | 11-07-2002 10:52 |
| how effective do you think robots going under the bar | archiver | 2001 | 4 | 24-06-2002 00:36 |
| What about prettiest robots? | archiver | 2000 | 8 | 23-06-2002 23:09 |
| 'Accidently' ripping other robots apart | Vipersna | Rumor Mill | 6 | 04-01-2002 23:27 |
Threaded Mode