OCCRA
Go to Post With a little time and practice, I think that most people would find that there is no magic involved in programming. - Dave Scheck [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2018, 04:22 PM
Nate Laverdure's Avatar
Nate Laverdure Nate Laverdure is offline
Cynicism isn't wisdom
FRC #2363
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,086
Nate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
It might be on the small side in comparison to other brands...
Hmm. Our 4awg cable has 392 strands vs your 370. The strand diameter (.25mm) is supposedly the same, for about 6% more cross section area.

Our battery cables are much bigger & more powerful than yours, and they work!

Last edited by Nate Laverdure : 01-03-2018 at 04:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #32   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2018, 04:31 PM
Travis Covington's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Travis Covington Travis Covington is offline
Engineering Mentor
FRC #0254
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 629
Travis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate Laverdure View Post
Hmm. Our 4awg cable has 392 strands vs your 370. The strand diameter (.25mm) is supposedly the same, for about 6% more cross section area.
This is exactly what I was referring to. I have used 4awg wire on robots since 2000 and have come across all sizes of supposed '4awg high strand count' wire. If I am making a concerted effort to upsize my wire for current, heat and voltage drop reasons, I am going to use the largest stuff I can that still fits in the 4awg ring terminal (which has a significantly larger OD than the .22" SB50 ID). For reference and comparison, the 4awg Molex ring terminal we use on our batteries has a .280" minimum ID for the wire.
__________________
-Travis Covington

2008-2018 - Engineering Mentor of Team 254
2001-2008 - Engineering Mentor of Team 968
1998-2001 - Mechanical Director/Driver/Member of Team 115
Reply With Quote
  #33   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2018, 04:56 PM
marshall's Avatar
marshall marshall is offline
"Who's Marshall?"
FRC #0900 (The Zebracorns)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 3,085
marshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Covington View Post
This is exactly what I was referring to. I have used 4awg wire on robots since 2000 and have come across all sizes of supposed '4awg high strand count' wire. If I am making a concerted effort to upsize my wire for current, heat and voltage drop reasons, I am going to use the largest stuff I can that still fits in the 4awg ring terminal (which has a significantly larger OD than the .22" SB50 ID). For reference and comparison, the 4awg Molex ring terminal we use on our batteries has a .280" minimum ID for the wire.
Good info to know but I'm not sure what else to say...

The wire we have matches the specs listed from PowerWerx for their 4 awg wire as well: https://powerwerx.com/welding-cable-epdm

I do agree though about not all wire being equal. The larger stuff I've seen listed as 4 awg and held has not been OFC or bare copper though, it's been CCA - it's lighter but it doesn't conduct as well based on the measurements I've seen and what I've read.
__________________
"La mejor salsa del mundo es la hambre" - Miguel de Cervantes
"The future is unwritten" - Joe Strummer
"Simplify, then add lightness" - Colin Chapman
Clarke's Laws
Reply With Quote
  #34   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-03-2018, 04:59 PM
Travis Covington's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Travis Covington Travis Covington is offline
Engineering Mentor
FRC #0254
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 629
Travis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond reputeTravis Covington has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
Good info to know but I'm not sure what else to say...

The wire we have matches the specs listed from PowerWerx for their 4 awg wire as well: https://powerwerx.com/welding-cable-epdm

I do agree though about not all wire being equal. The larger stuff I've seen listed as 4 awg and held has not been OFC or bare copper though, it's been CCA - it's lighter but it doesn't conduct as well based on the measurements I've seen and what I've read.
I think your references and Nate's are both great for teams to have access to and understand. Just helping to provide more information for people to leverage.
__________________
-Travis Covington

2008-2018 - Engineering Mentor of Team 254
2001-2008 - Engineering Mentor of Team 968
1998-2001 - Mechanical Director/Driver/Member of Team 115
Reply With Quote
  #35   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-16-2018, 10:39 AM
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG AlanG is offline
Mentor
AKA: Alan Glaser
FRC #6829 (Ignite Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Suwanee, GA
Posts: 14
AlanG is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Zondag View Post
To prevent terminal loosening, we use edge-biter clips and zip tip the leads to the clip.
Never had a loose cable since we started doing this 6 years ago.
Jim,

I can't quite tell from your picture -- did you just bend the battery terminals toward the center of the battery, or are you using pre-bent lugs?

Thanks,
Alan
Reply With Quote
  #36   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-19-2018, 12:15 PM
Kellen Hill's Avatar
Kellen Hill Kellen Hill is offline
Strategist
AKA: The user formerly known as 'hill'
FRC #1746 (OTTO)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 546
Kellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond reputeKellen Hill has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Hey Alan,

These are the 90 degree lugs I was able to find for 4awg. I assume these are similar to what Jim is using. You can also use your DigiKey voucher for these if you haven't done so already.

DigiKey 298-11646-ND
__________________
1625 Winnovation Member: 2005-07
1625 College Mentor: 2007-11
525 Swartdogs Mentor: 2011-12
1746 OTTO Lead Mentor: 2013-Present
Reply With Quote
  #37   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-16-2018, 06:05 PM
Cash4587's Avatar
Cash4587 Cash4587 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Cooper Cash
FRC #4587 (Jersey Voltage)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 534
Cash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond reputeCash4587 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Marshall, Which diameter Nord-Lock Wedge lock washer did you guys use from Mcmaster? The 0.350" OD or the 0.430" OD?

https://www.mcmaster.com/#91074a327/=1blmdbp

https://www.mcmaster.com/#91074a127/=1blmdgs

Thanks
__________________
Team 4587: Jersey Voltage - Lead Technical Mentor, Drive Coach
Reply With Quote
  #38   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-12-2018, 10:08 AM
frank-g-e frank-g-e is offline
Registered User
FRC #0341
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 20
frank-g-e is on a distinguished road
Question Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

You use, and specify, cable lugs with a 1/4" bolt hole. Is there an advantage over using using lugs with a #10 bolt hole that matches the battery terminals on the permitted batteries and the bolt sets that are provided by some battery makers?

The smaller hole would provide more mating surface (less resistance, less heat) between the lug and the battery and provide better gripping for the washers.

I believe purchased cables, which come assembled, use the 1/4" hole as well, but I think this is for the robot side of the power cables where the bolt posts are 1/4".

Alternatively, has anyone widened the holes in the battery terminals to 1/4" and used 1/4" bolt sets? Is this allowed?
Reply With Quote
  #39   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-12-2018, 10:27 AM
frank-g-e frank-g-e is offline
Registered User
FRC #0341
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: PA
Posts: 20
frank-g-e is on a distinguished road
Exclamation Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by Travis Covington View Post
This is exactly what I was referring to. I have used 4awg wire on robots since 2000 and have come across all sizes of supposed '4awg high strand count' wire. If I am making a concerted effort to upsize my wire for current, heat and voltage drop reasons, I am going to use the largest stuff I can that still fits in the 4awg ring terminal (which has a significantly larger OD than the .22" SB50 ID). For reference and comparison, the 4awg Molex ring terminal we use on our batteries has a .280" minimum ID for the wire.
I see the same thing. I have seen online specifications for 6 AWG wires and lugs ranging from .167 for single strand to .25 for the 1000+ strand that I use. I figure more strands leaves more air gaps around the strands, but when crimped properly the air gaps are eliminated provided a nearly solid wire under the crimp. Cutting some strands to fit in the .22 SB50 lugs slightly increases resistance over a length of less than 1/8". I don't worry about this because it is less significant than using 50 AMP connectors on 75 AMP AWG 6 wire in front of a 120 AMP circuit breaker on a application that pulls over 200 AMPs for up to a few seconds! I would use #2 wire in SB120 connectors but this is less important than having a driver that is 5% better.
Reply With Quote
  #40   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-12-2018, 10:32 AM
Nate Laverdure's Avatar
Nate Laverdure Nate Laverdure is offline
Cynicism isn't wisdom
FRC #2363
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 1,086
Nate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond reputeNate Laverdure has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by frank-g-e View Post
Is there an advantage over using using lugs with a #10 bolt hole that matches the battery terminals on the permitted batteries?
Yeah, we think so. In general, by increasing L/D ratio of the fastener, we decrease the stiffness of the bolted joint and make it more able to ride through a wider range of external load conditions without losing complete preload. Here is the lug we have used. We use #10-32 SHCS with nylon locknuts. Between the battery terminal and the cable lug we use 97527A005, an internal/external tooth lock washer with a slight belleville shape. It is the best washer I've seen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by frank-g-e View Post
Is there an advantage over using...the bolt sets that are provided by some battery makers?
We throw these away.
-- Hex head screws encourage the user to try to break stuff
-- Split lock washers are the devil's lock washers
Reply With Quote
  #41   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-12-2018, 10:52 AM
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 2,605
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Love, love, LOVE the use of Nord lockwashers. I cannot speak highly enough of them.

I would encourage every team to section a few sample crimps to see that everything is working as expected. 4awg crimps should have 140lbf (UL) to 400lbf (Mil Spec) pullout strength, so a simple hand-tug will only catch the worst of the worst crimp attempts.

Great write-up, I am pleased to see more and more teams opening up the biggest electrical bottleneck in FRC!
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #42   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-13-2018, 11:29 PM
nullmainmethod's Avatar
nullmainmethod nullmainmethod is offline
Registered User
FRC #6502 (DARC Side)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Rookie Year: 2017
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 264
nullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant futurenullmainmethod has a brilliant future
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quick question:

Our crimp tool (very similar to you guys', one of the hydraulic ones from Amazon) came with metric dies.

We used the die labeled 16 (iirc) and our crimps come out looking like this:
https://i.imgur.com/BWpHlN7.jpg

If we step die size up to the next largest size, it barely crimps at all and most definitely does not hold the wire. If we go down to a smaller size it just pancakes even more...

We put the end of the contact into a vice, tugged on the wire with as much force as we could and it seems to hold fine. Just wondering if this might result in any long term problems...?
__________________




"Remember to hacksaw off the rest of the quick grips to give yourself more room" - /u/Tapego
Reply With Quote
  #43   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-14-2018, 08:35 AM
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 2,605
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by nullmainmethod View Post
Quick question:

Our crimp tool (very similar to you guys', one of the hydraulic ones from Amazon) came with metric dies.

We used the die labeled 16 (iirc) and our crimps come out looking like this:
https://i.imgur.com/BWpHlN7.jpg

If we step die size up to the next largest size, it barely crimps at all and most definitely does not hold the wire. If we go down to a smaller size it just pancakes even more...

We put the end of the contact into a vice, tugged on the wire with as much force as we could and it seems to hold fine. Just wondering if this might result in any long term problems...?
Flashing from crimping is normal. Higher-end crimping tools have trimmers that cut this flashing off automatically. Just file the flashing down if it doesn't fit in the SB housing and you'll be fine.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #44   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-14-2018, 09:30 AM
cbale2000's Avatar
cbale2000 cbale2000 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Chris Bale
FRC #5712 (Gray Matter)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 1,690
cbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond reputecbale2000 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

So, two questions:
  1. Are SB120s actually legal to use on FRC robots? My impression was that only the SB50 was allowed. Did I miss something in the rules this year?
  2. What is the actual observed benefit for using larger gauge wire for FRC battery connections? I get that there's less resistance, but does this result in longer runtimes or more efficient discharges, or something else? How significant is this benefit, has anyone measured it, or are the results mostly anecdotal?
__________________
2005-2008: FRC 703 Phoenix - Robot Driver
2009-2016: FRC 703 Phoenix - Mentor
2017-????: FRC 5712 Gray Matter - Mentor
Reply With Quote
  #45   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-14-2018, 09:43 AM
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 2,605
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FRC Battery Upgrade

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbale2000 View Post
So, two questions:
  1. Are SB120s actually legal to use on FRC robots? My impression was that only the SB50 was allowed. Did I miss something in the rules this year?
  2. What is the actual observed benefit for using larger gauge wire for FRC battery connections? I get that there's less resistance, but does this result in longer runtimes or more efficient discharges, or something else? How significant is this benefit, has anyone measured it, or are the results mostly anecdotal?
1) Yes, the rules simply specify an "SB" connector.
2) Larger margin on brown-outs was the single biggest reason we switched to 2AWG main wiring last year, which improved ~0.4-0.7V under peak loading vs 6awg wiring.

Operating at higher voltages improves available power, run time, reduces motor heating, and results in generally more consistent performance over a match. Being worth it is up to your team to decide based on your priorities. We're not going back to 6awg any time soon though.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi