OCCRA
Go to Post One team at the UTC regional scored over 2100 points in autonomous alone. I was highly impressed. - Greg Marra [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 08:12 PM
swootton swootton is offline
Registered User
AKA: Steve Wootton
FRC #4055 (NRG4055)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Barkhamsted, CT
Posts: 75
swootton is on a distinguished road
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmattin5459 View Post
This is nice for those who wouldn't understand a weighted cost-benefit table. However, I don't believe it's a very good substitute for it at all.

First off, it lacks granularity and makes certain drivetrain types seem better than others from a numerical standpoint when they really aren't. Parallel Omnis seems like a great choice for a drivetrain on paper, better than tank drive (hint: it really isn't. I like different drivetrain designs, but go with a 2 x 2 or butterfly or something if you want better turning).

Speaking of tank drive, KOP isn't really the baseline you want it to be. Any decent custom tank drive is more reliable than the KOP chassis, has more pushing power, and more mobility.

To properly explain drivetrain design, it's best to come up with a long-winded post on why tank drive is the best and you should never use anything but tank drive (that's not really what I believe, but it'll go over well on CD). Explain that every single drivetrain other than tank will break down by the end of every match or be so complex that you wouldn't get done with it by the end of build season (again, sarcasm intended, but this is how CD feels).

Seriously though, best way to explain drivetrains is to justify your claims.
So as posted you make general assumptions and imply that most of CD would choose tank drive as best. For many teams it is the best choice for many reason. We are a 6th year team and have run a KOP drive train all 6 years. For recycle rush we took the tread off the center two wheels and ran omnis with an additional pair of omnis in the center, last year we ran aluminum 8" wheels with stock gearing. I would put our bot up against any other bot and I can guarantee that our driver can play hard core defense on you no matter what drive train you have.

We are in New England and it gets rough. We have never broken any drive train component and have gone head to head against 8wd 6 cim, swerve, West Coast, just to name a few. In Waterbury we were pushing not one but two robots across the field at the same time with a 100% KOP drive train.

In Greater Boston there was a second year team that opted out of the KOP and built a swerve drive because the thought the stock drive train wouldn't work well. Because of their budget and team resources they had a very maneuverable robot the could could place 3-4 gears and do nothing else. This was their second event and our team got them climbing by Sunday morning. They didn't do much time and money on building and programming their swerve drive it left no time for any manipulators.

Drive train is just one part of the whole robot. If you don't have the time, money or team resources a fancy drive train is a luxury you can afford if you can't play the game.

If we could we would love to try a different drive train type but until we build, develop and test one before build season it will not be part of our design. We have a simple rule, "If you can't move, you can't play" so until we have another proven design that we can build and program just as quickly with a 100% non-failure guarantee we will be using a KOP drive train because it works.

If you want proof just look for matches at Waterbury or Greater Boston District this year or any event from 2014 that we played defense and you'll have your proof. If we're playing against 558 you can almost certainly see some defense between us and they run 8wd colsons with 6 cims most years.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #17   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 08:21 PM
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,411
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by frcguy View Post
I think you're reading it wrong. KoP isn't getting dinged on anything.
This is correct, the KoP is my baseline for everything. From there each attribute is graded as either better, worse, or equal.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillon Carey View Post
I'm not sure how your defining power. I'd argue that it's pretty independent from drive train type (except if your accounting for efficiency losses).
For example, you have 2+2 listed as low power. Our 2014 bot had 6 CIMs, which most would argue is plenty (or more) power than you need.
I was more working from staying power which is where it gets dinged because it can be more easily spun.



Quote:
Originally Posted by pmattin5459 View Post
This is nice for those who wouldn't understand a weighted cost-benefit table. However, I don't believe it's a very good substitute for it at all.

First off, it lacks granularity and makes certain drivetrain types seem better than others from a numerical standpoint when they really aren't. Parallel Omnis seems like a great choice for a drivetrain on paper, better than tank drive (hint: it really isn't. I like different drivetrain designs, but go with a 2 x 2 or butterfly or something if you want better turning).

Speaking of tank drive, KOP isn't really the baseline you want it to be. Any decent custom tank drive is more reliable than the KOP chassis, has more pushing power, and more mobility.

To properly explain drivetrain design, it's best to come up with a long-winded post on why tank drive is the best and you should never use anything but tank drive (that's not really what I believe, but it'll go over well on CD). Explain that every single drivetrain other than tank will break down by the end of every match or be so complex that you wouldn't get done with it by the end of build season (again, sarcasm intended, but this is how CD feels).

Seriously though, best way to explain drivetrains is to justify your claims.
You're right, this doesn't replace a good WOT or a good discussion. However, one of the goals was to distill a design/prototyping process to something that can be seen at a glance. Things like this are useful for showing to judges or as documentation.

KoP is a baseline because it's about the only thing every single team can see the performance of. It's a baseline precisely to get everyone on the same page.

Quote:
Parallel Omnis seems like a great choice for a drivetrain on paper, better than tank drive
I'm not sure if you're quite reading this chart properly. On paper Asteroid Drive (I'm trying Nate!) is about equal to the KoP drive, it's a bit more mobile but has less staying power.
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #18   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 08:49 PM
marshall's Avatar
marshall marshall is offline
Discerning and exacting individual
FRC #0900 (The Zebracorns)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,830
marshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Zebracorn Swerve - Taking Unicorn Swerve and making it more complicated with ROS, Stereocameras, and White Papers.
__________________
"La mejor salsa del mundo es la hambre" - Miguel de Cervantes
"The future is unwritten" - Joe Strummer
"Simplify, then add lightness" - Colin Chapman
Clarke's Laws
Reply With Quote
  #19   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 08:55 PM
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,411
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
Zebracorn Swerve - Taking Unicorn Swerve and making it more complicated with ROS, Stereocameras, and White Papers.
Just for clarification on where 900's drivetrains fall:

__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #20   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 08:59 PM
PayneTrain's Avatar
PayneTrain PayneTrain is offline
Looking up Gracious Professionalism
AKA: Wil "just give me crabcake" Payne
FRC #0422 (The Tex-Mex Drajones)
Team Role: Mascot
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: RVA
Posts: 2,469
PayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond reputePayneTrain has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Just for clarification on where 900's drivetrains fall:

hey now, those harpoons are undefeated
Reply With Quote
  #21   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 10:51 PM
pmattin5459's Avatar
pmattin5459 pmattin5459 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Patrick Mattin
FRC #5459 (Ipswich TIGERS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 141
pmattin5459 has much to be proud ofpmattin5459 has much to be proud ofpmattin5459 has much to be proud ofpmattin5459 has much to be proud ofpmattin5459 has much to be proud ofpmattin5459 has much to be proud ofpmattin5459 has much to be proud ofpmattin5459 has much to be proud of
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Here's my drivetrain philosophy has 3 Sacred Rules, in order of most importance to least:

1. Build what you know. If you've never built a drivetrain type before, avoid it. Nearly every team knows how to build a tank drive and every team should be able to build a KOP drivetrain, so naturally these are the most common and well-loved drivetrains out there. But there are teams that excel using non-tank drivetrains that are more reliable than some tank drives. Why? Because they've gone over several design iterations over years of competition (see 148's Nonadrive for a good example, or 16's legendary swerve).

2. Build what fits. Weight and space restrictions. Pretty obvious, but it needed to go somewhere.

3. Build what fits with your strategy. That's where weighted tables and such come in handy. If you have multiple drivetrains that fit the first two rules, this is how you pick the right one. But any candidates at this point must satisfy the above rules.

I think this is a more precise and nuanced answer to "what drivetrain should we use" than simply "tank drive" or "depends on the game".
Reply With Quote
  #22   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 11:47 PM
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,411
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmattin5459 View Post
Here's my drivetrain philosophy has 3 Sacred Rules, in order of most importance to least:

1. Build what you know. If you've never built a drivetrain type before, avoid it. Nearly every team knows how to build a tank drive and every team should be able to build a KOP drivetrain, so naturally these are the most common and well-loved drivetrains out there. But there are teams that excel using non-tank drivetrains that are more reliable than some tank drives. Why? Because they've gone over several design iterations over years of competition (see 148's Nonadrive for a good example, or 16's legendary swerve).

2. Build what fits. Weight and space restrictions. Pretty obvious, but it needed to go somewhere.

3. Build what fits with your strategy. That's where weighted tables and such come in handy. If you have multiple drivetrains that fit the first two rules, this is how you pick the right one. But any candidates at this point must satisfy the above rules.

I think this is a more precise and nuanced answer to "what drivetrain should we use" than simply "tank drive" or "depends on the game".
I still think you're mistaking the point - I don't CARE what choice teams make. I want them to start putting things in easily digestible chunks for judges, sponsors, younger students. But because representing data is hard I wanted to share a viable way to do this that most folks could create in Powerpoint if needed.

Unrelated.- it's ironic you mention 16's legendary swerve as this came out of a comparison of their drivetrain with JT :\
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #23   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 11:55 PM
marshall's Avatar
marshall marshall is offline
Discerning and exacting individual
FRC #0900 (The Zebracorns)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,830
marshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
I still think you're mistaking the point - I don't CARE what choice teams make. I want them to start putting things in easily digestible chunks for judges, sponsors, younger students. But because representing data is hard I wanted to share a viable way to do this that most folks could create in Powerpoint if needed.

Unrelated.- it's ironic you mention 16's legendary swerve as this came out of a comparison of their drivetrain with JT :\
I feel as though this point is lost on many who would rather have a debate about the merits of a holy war... waiting on someone to show up and start going on about Endians and eggs now.
__________________
"La mejor salsa del mundo es la hambre" - Miguel de Cervantes
"The future is unwritten" - Joe Strummer
"Simplify, then add lightness" - Colin Chapman
Clarke's Laws
Reply With Quote
  #24   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-20-2017, 11:59 PM
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,411
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
I feel as though this point is lost on many who would rather have a debate about the merits of a holy war... waiting on someone to show up and start going on about Endians and eggs now.
Holy Wars are an effective way to empty orphanages
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #25   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-21-2017, 12:35 AM
Mechvet Mechvet is offline
Electromechanicadchining Mentor
AKA: Craig Hickman
FRC #0114
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Yay Area
Posts: 161
Mechvet is a splendid one to beholdMechvet is a splendid one to beholdMechvet is a splendid one to beholdMechvet is a splendid one to beholdMechvet is a splendid one to beholdMechvet is a splendid one to beholdMechvet is a splendid one to behold
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by marshall View Post
Zebracorn Swerve - Taking Unicorn Swerve and making it more complicated with ROS, Stereocameras, and White Papers.
Wait, you guys use ROS? Happen to have a link where I can creep on your integration?
Reply With Quote
  #26   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-21-2017, 12:43 AM
marshall's Avatar
marshall marshall is offline
Discerning and exacting individual
FRC #0900 (The Zebracorns)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,830
marshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mechvet View Post
Wait, you guys use ROS? Happen to have a link where I can creep on your integration?
Yes and when build season is over we'll do our thing that we do. At the moment, if you're really interested then look at what Tuft's is doing with Baxter and ROS for LabVIEW. We borrowed (READ: stole) heavily from their work.
__________________
"La mejor salsa del mundo es la hambre" - Miguel de Cervantes
"The future is unwritten" - Joe Strummer
"Simplify, then add lightness" - Colin Chapman
Clarke's Laws
Reply With Quote
  #27   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-21-2017, 07:43 AM
Taylor's Avatar
Taylor Taylor is offline
Professor of Thinkology, ThD
AKA: @taylorstem
FRC #3487 (Red Pride Robotics)
Team Role: Teacher
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN, USA 46227
Posts: 4,716
Taylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond reputeTaylor has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

It's cute how you label it as "subjective" so you don't have to entertain opposing views.

But really it's not about drive trains. It's about decision making and documentation and organization and clear communication. To that end, I think this works well.
__________________
Hi!
Reply With Quote
  #28   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-21-2017, 07:58 AM
KJaget's Avatar
KJaget KJaget is offline
Zebravision Labs
FRC #0900
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Cary, NC
Posts: 104
KJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud ofKJaget has much to be proud of
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Schreiber View Post
Just for clarification on where 900's drivetrains fall:

I expected more red.
Reply With Quote
  #29   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-21-2017, 07:58 AM
Andrew Schreiber Andrew Schreiber is offline
User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2000
Location: Misplaced Michigander
Posts: 4,411
Andrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond reputeAndrew Schreiber has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor View Post
It's cute how you label it as "subjective" so you don't have to entertain opposing views.

But really it's not about drive trains. It's about decision making and documentation and organization and clear communication. To that end, I think this works well.
Yup, I could have made it about types of cookies (which oatmeal raisin is the definitive loser, fight me) but figured making it something at least somewhat pertinent might be of more use.
__________________




.
Reply With Quote
  #30   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-21-2017, 08:00 AM
marshall's Avatar
marshall marshall is offline
Discerning and exacting individual
FRC #0900 (The Zebracorns)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,830
marshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond reputemarshall has a reputation beyond repute
Re: pic: Subjective Eval of Common Drive Systems

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJaget View Post
I expected more red.
It's actually a graph of my energy levels the day we built it between caffeine runs.
__________________
"La mejor salsa del mundo es la hambre" - Miguel de Cervantes
"The future is unwritten" - Joe Strummer
"Simplify, then add lightness" - Colin Chapman
Clarke's Laws
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi