OCCRA
Go to Post I wouldn't want to replay Lunacy -- the Moon is a harsh mistress! - Richard Wallace [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > ChiefDelphi.com Website > Extra Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-26-2013, 05:13 PM
Jim Zondag's Avatar
Jim Zondag Jim Zondag is offline
Team Leader
FRC #0033 (Killer Bees)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Auburn Hills
Posts: 324
Jim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond repute
paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Thread created automatically to discuss a document in CD-Media.

FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System by Jim Zondag
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-26-2013, 06:59 PM
Richard Wallace's Avatar
Richard Wallace Richard Wallace is offline
I live for the details.
FRC #3620 (Average Joes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 3,981
Richard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond reputeRichard Wallace has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Great resource, Jim. Thanks for sharing it.

I expect it to help FIRSTers, both inside and outside the District systems, to better understand how our sport has evolved, and where it is headed.
__________________
Richard Wallace

Mentor since 2011 for FRC 3620 Average Joes (St. Joseph, Michigan)
Mentor 2002-10 for FRC 931 Perpetual Chaos (St. Louis, Missouri)
since 2003

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
(Cosmic Religion : With Other Opinions and Aphorisms (1931) by Albert Einstein, p. 97)
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-26-2013, 07:08 PM
Grim Tuesday's Avatar
Grim Tuesday Grim Tuesday is offline
Registered User
AKA: Simon Bohn
FRC #0639 (Code Red)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Baltimore MD (JHU)
Posts: 1,617
Grim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond reputeGrim Tuesday has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Thanks for putting this together, I learned a lot reading through it. Honestly it just makes me wish that New York would move towards a District System sooner. Has anyone formed an exploratory committee yet?
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-26-2013, 08:08 PM
AllenGregoryIV's Avatar
AllenGregoryIV AllenGregoryIV is offline
Engineering Coach
AKA: Allen "JAG" Gregory
FRC #3847 (Spectrum)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,714
AllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond reputeAllenGregoryIV has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to AllenGregoryIV
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Thank You so much
__________________

Team 647 | Cyber Wolf Corps | Alumni | 2003-2006 | Shoemaker HS
Team 2587 | DiscoBots | Mentor | 2008-2011 | Rice University / Houston Food Bank
Team 3847 | Spectrum | Coach | 2012-20... | St Agnes Academy
LRI | Alamo Regional | 2014-20...
"Competition has been shown to be useful up to a certain point and no further, but cooperation, which is the thing we must strive for today, begins where competition leaves off." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-26-2013, 08:38 PM
Steven Donow Steven Donow is offline
Registered User
AKA: Scooby
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,335
Steven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond reputeSteven Donow has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grim Tuesday View Post
Thanks for putting this together, I learned a lot reading through it. Honestly it just makes me wish that New York would move towards a District System sooner. Has anyone formed an exploratory committee yet?
I'm not positive, but I believe NY is, in some aspects, a possible part of the New England district plans. I'm sure someone close to that can confirm or deny that.

NY is a tough state it seems, because logistically, NYC probably can't move to districts for awhile, it seems like upstate NY is split between teams that go to events like FLR and Buckeye, as well as teams that go to NE events. I'd assume this means a split similar to what MAR did with PA, but I also feel like when reading NE documentation, they discussed the strong possibility of allowing an "opt-out" of the District system.
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-26-2013, 09:04 PM
EricLeifermann's Avatar
EricLeifermann EricLeifermann is offline
That was a short break
FRC #2826 (Wave Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,201
EricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Coming from someone who was very upset in 2009 because of the move to districts, my team at the time was 857 located in the very western portion of the UP, the FIM district model didn't and still doesn't make sense for them(if they got put in a district model with Wisconsin and Minnesota or something like that, would make sense), this FAQ gives allot of insight. Though it seems that most of your questions that have an answer involving HQ paints HQ into a bad light. The question talking about making state free, but HQ saying no is ridiculous. I can see how they didn't want teams outside of the district model to get in an uproar that teams are getting a free competition, but now they could use that model as an incentive for more areas/states going to a district model.

I also don't understand why HQ cares how you dictate what awards are worth and what they earn you in terms of points to the state championship.

That being said thanks for putting this out Jim. Hope to see 33's bot up close in St. Louis.
__________________
2002-2005 Appleton East High School: Team 93
2005-2011 Michigan Technological University: Team 857
2012-Present Wave Robotics Team 2826



Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 06:28 AM
Joe J.'s Avatar
Joe J. Joe J. is offline
My Gaming Is FIRST!
AKA: Joey
FRC #0862 (Lightning Robotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Canton, MI, USA
Posts: 804
Joe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond reputeJoe J. has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Joe J.
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Very well put together Jim, thank you! I learned a few things about the district system I hadn't even realized I didn't know.
__________________
Joe Jagadics
Lead Mentor / Coach
Lightning Robotics FRC Team 862

Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 06:47 AM
IKE's Avatar
IKE IKE is offline
Not so Custom User Title
AKA: Isaac Rife
no team (N/A)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,212
IKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond reputeIKE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann View Post
Coming from someone who was very upset in 2009 because of the move to districts, my team at the time was 857 located in the very western portion of the UP, the FIM district model didn't and still doesn't make sense for them(if they got put in a district model with Wisconsin and Minnesota or something like that, would make sense), this FAQ gives allot of insight. ....
As the paper states, it works well for areas with reasonably high densities of teams... which is not the UP (upper penninsula for you folks outside of the midwest).

One question Jim, that I have been asked, but I did not see answered was:
"Why can't teams opt out?" Eric and a handful of others that do not see the "local" benefit have asked this. There were also a lot of folks asking this when the MAR was forming. This was especially asked by "travel" teams.

Really good paper , and I for one am glad we play with the lights on. It makes for a lot better pictures and scouting.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 08:50 AM
Ed Law's Avatar
Ed Law Ed Law is offline
Registered User
no team (formerly with 2834)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 754
Ed Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond reputeEd Law has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann View Post
Though it seems that most of your questions that have an answer involving HQ paints HQ into a bad light. The question talking about making state free, but HQ saying no is ridiculous. I can see how they didn't want teams outside of the district model to get in an uproar that teams are getting a free competition, but now they could use that model as an incentive for more areas/states going to a district model.

I also don't understand why HQ cares how you dictate what awards are worth and what they earn you in terms of points to the state championship.
I don't think Jim intended to paint HQ in a bad light. He was just stating the facts. In the last 4 years, people were upset with FiM thinking it was FiM that made up all these seemingly ridiculous rules when in fact it was HQ that dictates what Michigan can or cannot do. Most people don't know that none of the money teams pay to enter an event goes to pay for running the event. All the money goes to HQ. It is not hard to understand why they don't want the State Championship to be free.

In terms of why they dictate some awards do not earn any points, FIRST is a brand and like any other brand, you need to protect what it stands for. They cannot let people change the importance of certain awards. I think they have the right to do so.

I don't have a problem with what HQ does. They are a business, even if it is a non profit organizaion. They need to plan for growth and sustainability just like any other business. It costs money to run and expand. I guess they are using the FRC money to subsidize FTC and FLL, but if that is true I am okay with that since many of the FRC members come from FLL teams. If you look at their financial statement, they have a very healthy cash reserve. I agree with Jim that the price of entry for FRC should come down now that we have so many more teams comparing to many years ago.
__________________
Please don't call me Mr. Ed, I am not a talking horse.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 09:56 AM
Kims Robot's Avatar Unsung FIRST Hero
Kims Robot Kims Robot is offline
Onto a New Chapter...
AKA: Kim O'Toole Eckhardt
no team
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Rookie Year: 1996
Location: Framingham, MA
Posts: 1,467
Kims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond reputeKims Robot has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kims Robot
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Quote:
Originally Posted by DevenStonow View Post
I'm not positive, but I believe NY is, in some aspects, a possible part of the New England district plans. I'm sure someone close to that can confirm or deny that.
You can see nearly everything that NE FIRST has discussed on their blog:
http://www.nefirst.org/blog/

It is ONLY their proposal - there is plenty of negotiation with FIRST and the Region before any of this is finalized or adopted, but you can at least see the thought process and proposal there and keep up to date. NE was hoping that teams from NY could "opt in" in a conference model style, so that it wouldn't be a forced transition, but there is no guarantee that will be approved.
__________________
~kim~
Kimberly O'Toole Eckhardt <3
Principal Systems Engineer & Program Manager
History - Team 176, Team 229, Team 1511, FIRST Volunteer!!
My new FIRST Photography Hobby & Angry Eric's Fan Page
Excellence - is the result of caring more than others think is wise, risking more than others think is safe, dreaming more than others think is practical, and expecting more than others think is possible.
Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 10:01 AM
Jim Zondag's Avatar
Jim Zondag Jim Zondag is offline
Team Leader
FRC #0033 (Killer Bees)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Rookie Year: 1997
Location: Auburn Hills
Posts: 324
Jim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond reputeJim Zondag has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Thanks Ed.

To clarify: The purpose of this paper is to bring clarity to the reasoning behind the current state of affairs relating to the District Competition System. Many of these details have never really been publicly discussed. Now that several other regions are considering migrating to similar system, many people have been inquiring on the specifics of these details and I thought it would be good to add some more awareness to this topic.

This is not intended to paint anyone in a negative light. It is simply a list of questions and answers. FiM has a good partnership relationship with FIRST NH and we work together to improve many things together. We hope to do more together in the future. One of the key points of this document is that there are items that FiM was allowed to change, and there were items which we were not allowed to change. Most people in the FRC community are unaware of this split. As other areas approach FIRST about forming new District zones, they will encounter some of these same limits and hopefully these explanations help the new regions to better craft their proposals.

Eric, to address your question/issue:

Q33: "Why can't teams opt out of your District System if they would prefer to play at outside regionals instead; why are they forced to be included in the District System?"
A33: This requirement comes from FIRST NH, not FiM. When we formed the District pilot in 2009, FIRST insisted that all teams in our state be included in the system and would not allow any exceptions. FiM actually wanted to allow teams the option to be excluded, but FIRST felt that this would create too much registration complexity.

This question is an excellent example of why I wrote this paper. Perhaps I will include this in a future update. Eric's team is in a difficult situation, being in a remote corner of the state. For years, I get the sentiment that they actually blame FiM for making their lives more difficult. In fact, we are well of their particular situation and we tried to address this with FIRST. Unfortuanately, this was not approved. I am not sure Eric's team understands the details of the arrangement and who has control of this constraint. Under the current arrangement, FIRST insists on strict geographical definition of who is included in our system and who is not. FiM does not control this.
__________________
"To learn what is possible, we must attempt the impossible." Arthur C. Clarke

Last edited by Jim Zondag : 03-27-2013 at 10:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 10:41 AM
EricLeifermann's Avatar
EricLeifermann EricLeifermann is offline
That was a short break
FRC #2826 (Wave Robotics)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,201
EricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond reputeEricLeifermann has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Zondag View Post
Thanks Ed.

To clarify: The purpose of this paper is to bring clarity to the reasoning behind the current state of affairs relating to the District Competition System. Many of these details have never really been publicly discussed. Now that several other regions are considering migrating to similar system, many people have been inquiring on the specifics of these details and I thought it would be good to add some more awareness to this topic.

This is not intended to paint anyone in a negative light. It is simply a list of questions and answers. FiM has a good partnership relationship with FIRST NH and we work together to improve many things together. We hope to do more together in the future. One of the key points of this document is that there are items that FiM was allowed to change, and there were items which we were not allowed to change. Most people in the FRC community are unaware of this split. As other areas approach FIRST about forming new District zones, they will encounter some of these same limits and hopefully these explanations help the new regions to better craft their proposals.

Eric, to address your question/issue:

Q33: "Why can't teams opt out of your District System if they would prefer to play at outside regionals instead; why are they forced to be included in the District System?"
A33: This requirement comes from FIRST NH, not FiM. When we formed the District pilot in 2009, FIRST insisted that all teams in our state be included in the system and would not allow any exceptions. FiM actually wanted to allow teams the option to be excluded, but FIRST felt that this would create too much registration complexity.

This question is an excellent example of why I wrote this paper. Perhaps I will include this in a future update. Eric's team is in a difficult situation, being in a remote corner of the state. For years, I get the sentiment that they actually blame FiM for making their lives more difficult. In fact, we are well of their particular situation and we tried to address this with FIRST. Unfortuanately, this was not approved. I am not sure Eric's team understands the details of the arrangement and who has control of this constraint. Under the current arrangement, FIRST insists on strict geographical definition of who is included in our system and who is not. FiM does not control this.
I am no longer associated with 857 and can't speak for them, the current leadership of the team could love FIM.

I was speaking from my thoughts on the topic back in 2009. If you want to know why I "fought" it you are welcome to see my posts from 2009. When FIM was first brought to light I talked with many people involved in running FIM, including Jim, as to why it didn't make sense for 857 to be involved. They all listened with a concerned ear and told me the exact answer shown in Q33 Jim just gave.

For the record I loved FIM when I was involved in 2009-2011. It was awesome having 12 matches and getting more comp for your buck. It just didn't make sense financially and logistically for the team I was on at the time.

I think the district model makes sense for Michigan(though I may be one of the few who doesn't like the lights on during the competition ). I also think it makes sense to go in that direction for the entire FIRST organization. I also agree that with 3000 teams the entry fee is extremely high. It would make sense for it to be as high as it is if it actually went to the individual regionals teams attended. But that's for a different topic, so I will move one.

Again Jim , thanks for putting this out there, we can't demand transparency from FIRST if were not willing to give it our selves.
__________________
2002-2005 Appleton East High School: Team 93
2005-2011 Michigan Technological University: Team 857
2012-Present Wave Robotics Team 2826



Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 11:11 AM
JackS's Avatar
JackS JackS is offline
Relocating to PNW
FRC #2791 (Shaker Robotics)
Team Role: Mascot
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Loudonville, NY
Posts: 151
JackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond reputeJackS has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Quote:
Originally Posted by DevenStonow View Post
I'm not positive, but I believe NY is, in some aspects, a possible part of the New England district plans. I'm sure someone close to that can confirm or deny that.
At this point, we don't know exactly what is going on. NE FIRST is being deliberate and is trying to make sure the model is done right the first time. As a result, negotiations with FIRST are slow and rumors are that districts have been postponed to 2015. It will likely be awhile before we hear if FIRST allows NE's conference model. NE cannot absorb NY's capital region because not all teams in the area agreed to it.

Jim, this was a very insightful paper. Thanks for putting this together.
__________________
[2009-2017] FRC Team 2791 - Shaker Robotics
Colgate University '16
University of Washington '18
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 11:34 AM
MikeE's Avatar
MikeE MikeE is offline
Wrecking nice beaches since 1990
no team (Volunteer)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: New England -> Alaska
Posts: 381
MikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond reputeMikeE has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Thanks Jim, this is an excellent resource

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Law View Post
In terms of why they dictate some awards do not earn any points, FIRST is a brand and like any other brand, you need to protect what it stands for.
Although I hate to compare FIRST to Burger King or Dunkin' Donuts, we could think of FIRST as following a franchise model.
FIRST is responsible for supplying the core product, promoting and ensuring consistency across the brand, with Regional committees and Districts acting as operators or franchisees. One of the challenges of this type of organization is the different incentives driving each of the participants. District organizations are now akin to large franchisees who have a much larger stake in the brand, but often little direct influence on the franchise owner's decision making.

Last edited by MikeE : 03-27-2013 at 11:34 AM. Reason: Fixed typo
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 03-27-2013, 12:02 PM
Christopher149 Christopher149 is offline
Registered User
FRC #0857 (Superior Roboworks) FTC 10723 (SnowBots)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Houghton, MI
Posts: 1,161
Christopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond reputeChristopher149 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: paper: FAQs Regarding the FRC District Competition System

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann View Post
I am no longer associated with 857 and can't speak for them, the current leadership of the team could love FIM.
I can speak as current 857 leadership, and FiM is still kind of annoying. I (and I think this counts as we) love having two events with 12 matches each, but the travel is the worst part. We attended Traverse City and St. Joseph this year (both >7 hours travel time), whereas Duluth is 4 and Milwaukee and Minneapolis are both about 6.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi