OCCRA
Go to Post If your goal is to win matches... Pick the most capable candidate. If your goal is to change lives... Sometimes you pick those that need the most change. - IKE [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-13-2018, 12:10 PM
frc7197's Avatar
frc7197 frc7197 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tim
FRC #7197 (Mountie MegaBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 2
frc7197 is an unknown quantity at this point
JVN-Design Calc Question

When using the JVN calculator for linear motion, should you include the diameter of your sprocket(s) as the pulley diameter to get a better estimate of speed and amps? Example: Put 5.4" in the pulley for an elevator with #35 15t at the bottom to a #35 44t at the top. Or, is there a better choice/method on the JVN to estimate this? Thanks for any help!
Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-13-2018, 12:18 PM
Lil' Lavery Lil' Lavery is offline
Hungry Dawgs Run Faster
AKA: Sean Lavery
FRC #1712 (DAWGMA)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 7,573
Lil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond reputeLil' Lavery has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Lil' Lavery
Re: JVN-Design Calc Question

Use the pitch diameter of the sprocket you're driving with your motor as your pulley diameter.

If you're driving the 15t sprocket with your motor, use 1.79"
If you're driving the 44t sprocket with your motor, use 5.257"


Note: Current estimates in JVN's calculator don't seem to take efficiency of the gearing into account. So for elevators that experience significant amounts of friction or binding, your current draw may be above what JVN estimates.
__________________
Being correct doesn't mean you don't have to explain yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-13-2018, 12:19 PM
Mike Marandola's Avatar
Mike Marandola Mike Marandola is online now
Lead Bumper Mentor
AKA: Mike Marandola
FRC #0316 (LUNATECS)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Pedricktown, NJ
Posts: 808
Mike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond reputeMike Marandola has a reputation beyond repute
Re: JVN-Design Calc Question

You would use the pitch diameter of the driving sprocket attached to your gearbox. I assume the 44T sprocket is just an idler at the top of your system? The PD of a #35 15T sprocket is 1.790", so that is what you input for your drum size. Those numbers can be found in this document.
__________________
FRC 316 Student 2007 - 2011
FRC 316 Mentor 2012 - 2017
FRC 316 Lead Technical Mentor 2018 - ?
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-13-2018, 02:38 PM
Jared Russell's Avatar
Jared Russell Jared Russell is offline
4933T15
FRC #0254 (The Cheesy Poofs), FRC #0341 (Miss Daisy)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,537
Jared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond reputeJared Russell has a reputation beyond repute
Re: JVN-Design Calc Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil' Lavery View Post
Note: Current estimates in JVN's calculator don't seem to take efficiency of the gearing into account. So for elevators that experience significant amounts of friction or binding, your current draw may be above what JVN estimates.
I am pretty sure the current estimates in that calculator are calculating "holding" current for the load you specify. It is correct not to take inefficiency into account for this calculation; all that inefficiency is helping to hold the load. A 20% efficient transmission or a 100% efficient transmission will require the same amount of motor current to keep the same load stalled (all else being equal).

Friction is pretty great, except for when it isn't. A lot like gravity.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-13-2018, 03:01 PM
Kevin Sevcik's Avatar
Kevin Sevcik Kevin Sevcik is offline
(Insert witty comment here)
FRC #0057 (The Leopards)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Rookie Year: 1998
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,146
Kevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond reputeKevin Sevcik has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Sevcik Send a message via Yahoo to Kevin Sevcik
Re: JVN-Design Calc Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Russell View Post
I am pretty sure the current estimates in that calculator are calculating "holding" current for the load you specify. It is correct not to take inefficiency into account for this calculation; all that inefficiency is helping to hold the load. A 20% efficient transmission or a 100% efficient transmission will require the same amount of motor current to keep the same load stalled (all else being equal).

Friction is pretty great, except for when it isn't. A lot like gravity.
Depending on the kind of inefficiency, the holding current could be rather less, even. However, I still think there should be some indication as to the current draw considering efficiency as well. There was/is a thread on here about designing a lift with a worm gear as a reduction stage. And running the lift for several seconds to get to height. When you're talking about that level of inefficiency, the drastic increase in current draw to move the system would seriously affect the performance. Possibly enough to prevent the system from working.
__________________
The difficult we do today; the impossible we do tomorrow. Miracles by appointment only.

Lone Star Regional Troubleshooter
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-17-2018, 04:24 PM
frc7197's Avatar
frc7197 frc7197 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Tim
FRC #7197 (Mountie MegaBots)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Rookie Year: 2015
Location: Jackson, MI
Posts: 2
frc7197 is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: JVN-Design Calc Question

Thanks to all the responders! It's awesome being. A rookie team in a competition like FIRST! Hope to see some of you at competitions this season.
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 02-17-2018, 06:50 PM
Ether's Avatar
Ether Ether is offline
systems engineer (retired)
no team
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Rookie Year: 1969
Location: US
Posts: 9,126
Ether has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond reputeEther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: JVN-Design Calc Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared Russell View Post
all that inefficiency is helping to hold the load.
The direction of the static friction (helping or hurting) depends entirely on how your control approaches (and behaves at) the static position.

You have to build the smarts into the controller to "back off" and let the static friction help hold the load.


Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi