OCCRA
Go to Post When we design these systems ask " would I want my Mom (or daughter) standing next to this thing when it goes off? - Mike Betts [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > FIRST > General Forum
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Reply
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 01:14 AM
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20,536
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
FRC Outside of FRC

Something I've noticed more and more frequently these days has been bugging me more and more.

Seems like everybody who's faced with a real-world problem reaches for the good ol' FRC tools: CIM, 775Pro, Versa, AndyMark, you name it. And I'm guilty of that, too, on occasion.


But what if...
--The FRC tools aren't available?
--There's a cost constraint that is too tight to allow for your favorite FRC piece of equipment?
--You can't use the 1/2HP motor because it's just plain too big and bulky--even though you actually need the power?
--Everybody else is familiar with other things?

What then? Do you 1) panic call everybody just to find that '07 KOP gearbox? Or do you 2) redesign as necessary to get a replacement? Or do you 3) plan for multiple solutions? (Or do you realize quickly that you can't use FRC stuff and focus on what you CAN use?)


What I'm seeing a lot of is "I really need XYQ component, it's out of stock, does anybody have one I can obtain legally?" What I would really prefer to be seeing is a lot of "I designed for ABZ component, but it doesn't fit parameter SLK. Does anybody have any suggestions?" What I'd really, really like to see is "I want to use component D, but I can see these problems cropping up. How do I plan for quickly changing to another component as late as possible?"

Yes, I know. The familiar is really tempting. But here's the thing: When challenged to come up with a solution under $1K to a problem, I used FRC parts to find one, and could not quite fit under that budget. And I wasn't sure the CIMs planned for would hold up... On another project (at a different place) I'd love to be able to use a CIM-type motor. But on that one, while I'm sure a CIM-type motor would hold up, I'm pretty sure that other constraints would cause a pretty big problem--if I used an FRC CIM-type motor (or even if I used a CIM motor that wasn't FRC-legal).



In the bigger picture, I'm getting kind of worried. So much of FRC is COTS these days that I'm worried that the kids are getting "We can just bolt this together, from these sources, and we're fine" rather than how to select the proper solution from a wide array of sources, and properly integrate that with what they're working on. If they aren't getting that experience, how can we expect them to go to college, graduate, go into the workforce, and suddenly deal with the fact that, let's face it, various requirements will work against using FRC parts? Or familiar parts in general?

And the solution is NOT to eliminate COTS parts from FRC. Far from it. In my opinion, the proper solution is to have students explain how and why they're choosing to use what they're choosing to use. As a second option for teams that can do this, build an offseason robot using non-FRC-legal components (conspicuously and permanently marked as non-FRC-legal, please--your friendly inspectors) to see how things open up (or not).

Just some (semi-coherent) thoughts to spark discussion, and remind people that the world is bigger than just our experiences.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots; 2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics; 2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk


Reply With Quote
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 02:03 AM
M3rcuriel's Avatar
M3rcuriel M3rcuriel is offline
Head Mentor
AKA: Lee Mracek
FRC #0299 (Valkyrie Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Rookie Year: 2012
Location: Cupertino
Posts: 33
M3rcuriel has a spectacular aura aboutM3rcuriel has a spectacular aura aboutM3rcuriel has a spectacular aura about
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I have definitely encountered this problem, especially as I get more technically capable and start to work on things that, for instance, require handling stuff like brushless motors which you can't do with FRC COTS stuff, really.

For instance, I've spent most of the time I spend doing technically exciting projects doing them for FRC. As a result, I basically got to enjoy discovering the entire world of microcontrollers that I now can use to solve problems that the RoboRIO is 100% too overpowered for. So I suppose it's fair to say that I'm enjoying the greater freedom I have by not being locked into a single control system. That being said, I do tend to really miss the simplicity of having (for instance) all the power paths already laid out. I enjoy picking out and programming microcontrollers, not so much figuring out how to get them a steady supply of electricity from a battery. On the other hand, the challenge is always fun.

I am definitely concerned as FRC gets more and more COTS-focused. It's nice that we have a massive catalog of things designed specifically for FRC that we can just pick from, "bolt together", apply magic, and go. I also worry that as more and more features get wrapped up in COTS parts it will be harder to a) keep FRC generalizing to real-world engineering besides the engineering process, b) keep FRC from becoming too dominated by your ability to purchase advanced COTS parts, and c) prevent the marginal utility of innovation from being too low.

Of those, point a I think applies to what you've pointed out because, as you noticed as well, the more COTS FRC gets, the easier it is to sink into the mentality of being able to pull stuff off the shelf.

That being said, this definitely applies more to the electronics/programming aspects than to the mechanical design aspects.

I suppose it's also worth mentioning that, while, to use your example, designing to fit a budget, yes you do need to know how to explore options other than the FRC ones. Being in a "bolt it together" sort of mindset isn't necessarily a bad thing since a lot of topic areas in (especially electrical) engineering end up having a lot of bolting together, just with a different magazine to buy from.
Reply With Quote
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 06:22 AM
Jon Stratis's Avatar
Jon Stratis Jon Stratis is offline
Mentor, LRI, MN RPC
FRC #2177 (The Robettes)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,295
Jon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond reputeJon Stratis has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I think this is a mentor-based problem more than anything else, which means mentors are the key. A few years ago (more than a few, actually), I noticed there was a tendency developing among the mentors on my team to just say "grab XYZ motor and ABC gearbox for this". Yes, it was the right choice and yes, they did the math behind the solution quickly in their head. But all the students learned was to use those parts for that type of solution.

Ever since then, I've always tried to make sure the students are actually picking the motors and gearboxes used, which means taking them through the calculations. We figure out how much speed and torque is needed for an application, and I'll pull out the motor specs for a few different motors. They'll do the calculations to figure out which motor is most appropriate, and what the ideal gear ratio would be. Then we'll talk about the possibility of overheating at stall and why that plays into the decision. Then we'll search a couple of different websites to find the right gearbox (my favorite is looking at the gear ratio charts for the versa planetary, because that opens up a whole other discussion on how to judge between two different gearboxes that have the same reduction).

I don't know if it solves the problem you mention Eric, but I think it definitely helps.
__________________
2007 - Present: Mentor, 2177 The Robettes
LRI: North Star 2012-2016; Lake Superior 2013-2014; MN State Tournament 2013-2014, 2016-2017; Galileo 2016; Iowa 2017
2015: North Star Regional Volunteer of the Year
2016: Lake Superior WFFA
Reply With Quote
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 07:10 AM
StephenKohnle53's Avatar
StephenKohnle53 StephenKohnle53 is offline
Registered User
FRC #5556 (Carriagetown Robotics)
Team Role: Mechanical
 
Join Date: May 2016
Rookie Year: 2016
Location: Amesbury, MA
Posts: 45
StephenKohnle53 is a glorious beacon of lightStephenKohnle53 is a glorious beacon of lightStephenKohnle53 is a glorious beacon of lightStephenKohnle53 is a glorious beacon of lightStephenKohnle53 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

On my team, they always had a specific group of people do all of the complex things on my team specifically anything I did not already know. And the only building I got to do since I do not know much about engineering is bumpers, drilling, bolts and rivets. So now I know very little about engineering and as always we also stick with the same or similar parts and such no matter what even with our tiny budget. Oddly enough I've learned more about engineering from talking on chief delphi or on youtube than on my team. I still love my team though.
Reply With Quote
  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 08:13 AM
Rosiebotboss's Avatar
Rosiebotboss Rosiebotboss is offline
2015-17 Championship Divisional LRI
AKA: Dana P. Henry
FRC #0839 (Rosie Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Agawam, MA
Posts: 872
Rosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond reputeRosiebotboss has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Rosiebotboss
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
I think this is a mentor-based problem more than anything else, which means mentors are the key. A few years ago (more than a few, actually), I noticed there was a tendency developing among the mentors on my team to just say "grab XYZ motor and ABC gearbox for this". Yes, it was the right choice and yes, they did the math behind the solution quickly in their head. But all the students learned was to use those parts for that type of solution.

Ever since then, I've always tried to make sure the students are actually picking the motors and gearboxes used, which means taking them through the calculations. We figure out how much speed and torque is needed for an application, and I'll pull out the motor specs for a few different motors. They'll do the calculations to figure out which motor is most appropriate, and what the ideal gear ratio would be. Then we'll talk about the possibility of overheating at stall and why that plays into the decision. Then we'll search a couple of different websites to find the right gearbox (my favorite is looking at the gear ratio charts for the versa planetary, because that opens up a whole other discussion on how to judge between two different gearboxes that have the same reduction).

I don't know if it solves the problem you mention Eric, but I think it definitely helps.
To build on Jon's comments:
I'll take it one step further, on my team we specifically do not use the KitBot, we do not use AM or VexPro gearboxes in our drivetrain, (we do use the gears though), choosing to design and manufacture our own. We specifically do not use any 80/20, any pre manufactured items where all you have to do is cut to length, insert of couple of fasteners and you're done. The reason for this: because we can. We do have the capability of cnc machining up to 100" x 48", Part of the process, part of the inspiration is to have the student take their idea from brain to real part, as elegantly as possible.

I also realize not every team has the same opportunity, you build to your capabilities. I would rather see a rookie or under funded/under mentored team use pre made kitbots, AM or VexPro gearboxes, that not play at all.

In the real world, (not necessarily in my world, space and NASA, where we overdesign everything, and rightfully so) but in the commercial world, during he design of a product, if a commercially available motor. controller, widget is available and meets your requirement, then use it. Spend the extra time being your product prettier, more durable, add more capabilities.
__________________
Co-Founder/Mentor FRC Team 839 / JrFLL Team 137/Rosie Robotics/Agawam HS
Winner NEF District WPI 2016
Regional CA-08 Boston, 12 WPI, Eng'g Excellence, 12-15 UL Safety, 15 Motorola Quality
KPCB Entrepreneurship 04, 05, 06, 07, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
Rookie All Star and Top Rookie Seed 2002
Paul Harris Fellow, CMP Inspector 05-16, Head LRI NE FIRST JTB 1944-2008 "What did you do with your dash?"
Reply With Quote
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 08:53 AM
Monochron's Avatar
Monochron Monochron is offline
Engineering Mentor
AKA: Brian O'Sullivan
FRC #4561 (TerrorBytes)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Research Triangle Park, NC
Posts: 1,063
Monochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond reputeMonochron has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by StephenKohnle53 View Post
On my team, they always had a specific group of people do all of the complex things on my team specifically anything I did not already know. And the only building I got to do since I do not know much about engineering is bumpers, drilling, bolts and rivets. So now I know very little about engineering and as always we also stick with the same or similar parts and such no matter what even with our tiny budget. Oddly enough I've learned more about engineering from talking on chief delphi or on youtube than on my team. I still love my team though.
Have you asked to be involved in the engineering decisions? I don't know your team, but typically people are welcoming if you come to the table with initiative. If you can't seem to insert yourself in these discussions, do some calculations on your own and present those people with a solution that is complete as you can make it. Hopefully, if you can prove that you have the initiative, you will be accepted in.
__________________


2017 | Industrial Design, Gracious Professionalism, NCCMP Winners, NC District - 1st Seed
2016 | Innovation In Controls, Industrial Design, Quality Award, NC District - 4th Seed
Reply With Quote
  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 09:10 AM
JamesCH95's Avatar
JamesCH95 JamesCH95 is offline
Hardcore Dork
AKA: JCH
FRC #0095 (The Grasshoppers)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Rookie Year: 2001
Location: Enfield, NH
Posts: 2,163
JamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond reputeJamesCH95 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I like the COTS situation we're in. Guess what? In real life there are loads of COTS options for many different industrial, research, and design situations.

Thousands of companies offer many more options as far as ratios, motor sizes, drive styles, etc. to take the gearbox examples. Things like google and amazon are your friend here! We need a lot of oddball stuff where I work, assembling print heads in clean rooms, and there is rarely a hand tool or machine that we can't find OTS to work in our applications.

Designing custom stuff is cool and all, but far more often than not a custom solution is considerably more expensive than OTS hardware. When confronted with non-free machining expenses and the time required to create, edit, and release drawings for custom hardware within the constraints of a work-day those OTS options start to look mighty appealing. Not to mention generally shorter lead times for replacements or spares, customer support, and warranties.

While it can be tempting to stick with the familiar there is a multitude of readily accessible parts/products that cover an enormous variety of operation conditions and constraints. One merely needs to search for to find the right option. While making everything custom just 'because I can' has a certain appeal to it in creativity and elegance, it frequently is much more expensive than COTS solutions in industry where labor and machine time have costs and lead times associated with them.
__________________
Theory is a nice place, I'd like to go there one day, I hear everything works there.

Maturity is knowing you were an idiot, common sense is trying to not be an idiot, wisdom is knowing that you will still be an idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 09:37 AM
CEF CEF is offline
Registered User
FRC #5607
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 34
CEF has a spectacular aura aboutCEF has a spectacular aura aboutCEF has a spectacular aura about
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
In the bigger picture, I'm getting kind of worried. So much of FRC is COTS these days that I'm worried that the kids are getting "We can just bolt this together, from these sources, and we're fine" rather than how to select the proper solution from a wide array of sources, and properly integrate that with what they're working on.
I think of that as a feature not a bug. FRC puts a number of constraints on what teams can do. Those constraints tend to level the playing field and limit the scope of what kids have to do in a 6-week period. The rules also help limit the ability of mentors to take over using knowledge from their own jobs. ("We're using these components at work, I'm familiar with them, so lets just use them instead.")

Plus, the rules help ensure that teams can help each other. These forums get dozens of questions every season about individual motors, gearing and so on, and those questions are usually answered well. If teams weren't limited to a half-dozen different motors, but could choose from hundreds that are out on the market, that help would largely disappear.
Reply With Quote
  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 10:14 AM
nuclearnerd's Avatar
nuclearnerd nuclearnerd is offline
Speaking for myself, not my team
AKA: Brendan Simons
FRC #5406 (Celt-X)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Rookie Year: 2014
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 564
nuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond reputenuclearnerd has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I get where the OP is coming from, but I agree with CEF. This isn't really a problem. Sure, lots of "real life" mechanical and electrical engineering isn't as nicely plug-and-play as the modern FRC COTS ecosystem, but FRC isn't trying to be the real world, it's a stepping stone. As such the easier it is to bash out mechanisms in 6 weeks, the easier it is to inspire students. You might as well complain that lego isn't useful and fun because it snaps together too easily.

Besides which, what if students find FRC hardware actually helps them design something awesome in their post-secondary and adult careers? I had a student last year build a competition lunar rover from CIM motors, and I might be considering them for a future company product.

Last edited by nuclearnerd : 09-13-2017 at 10:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 10:32 AM
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20,536
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

Quote:
Originally Posted by nuclearnerd View Post
I get where the OP is coming from, but I agree with CEF. This isn't really a problem. Sure, lots of "real life" mechanical and electrical engineering isn't as nicely plug-and-play as the modern FRC COTS ecosystem, but FRC isn't trying to be the real world, it's a stepping stone. As such the easier it is to bash out mechanisms in 6 weeks, the easier it is to inspire students. You might as well complain that lego isn't useful and fun because it snaps together too easily.

Besides which, what if students find FRC hardware actually helps them design something awesome in their post-secondary and adult careers? I had a student last year build a competition lunar rover from CIM motors, and I might be considering them for a future company product.
That's the thing. It's not a problem, but what I'm seeing is that people are limiting themselves to FRC-specific solutions for non-FRC problems. Can a non-FRC problem be solved with an FRC-specific solution? Sure. Is it going to be more work than doing a little digging and turning up a more appropriate COTS solution? Uh, YEAH!

CIM motors, BTW, are a commercial solution. Just make sure you get the right one--FRC-type CIMs aren't the only ones out there. Just sayin'. (As I've pointed out in the past when someone asks.)


@CEF: I'm not talking about within FRC. I'm talking about when somebody goes into "the real world" and uses FRC stuff wherever they can because "that's what I'm familiar with". In FRC, stuff goes together "easily" because of certain "standard" features. Get into the real world, and you might be trying to match two different standards... and neither one has anything to to with the FRC hardware you're trying to slide in.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots; 2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics; 2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk


Reply With Quote
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 10:42 AM
Basel A Basel A is online now
It's pronounced Basl with a soft s
AKA: @BaselThe2nd
no team (that is, for now)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,098
Basel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond reputeBasel A has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I'm with Jon on this. Choosing components is an engineering process, and we should teach it as such. If we do that well, students should be able to look at their requirements and constraints, then find what they need, whether it's an FRC part of not. If anything, more COTS parts in FRC is better: more differing options, more opportunities to teach, more similar to real life engineering (where companies or divisions usually restrict themselves to certain engineering problems and outsource the rest).
__________________
Team 2337 | 2009-2012 | Student
Team 3322 | 2014-2017 | College Student
“Be excellent in everything you do and the results will just happen.”
-Paul Copioli

Last edited by Basel A : 09-13-2017 at 11:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 10:58 AM
Rangel's Avatar
Rangel Rangel is online now
John Rangel
FRC #0842 (Falcon Robotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 840
Rangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond reputeRangel has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I honestly don't think this is that big of a problem for the most part. For one, students after graduating will be forced to adapt after dealing with the first project that they have to pay for themselves or have a limited budget for. I also think it is fine that they learn this later on in college and/or industry. A lot of college students in general don't even get to the building skills that certain FRC graduates have. It's not that they aren't smart but a lot just haven't gotten much hands on experience on projects.
__________________
2012 Dean's List Winner
2011-2014 Arizona Regional Winners
2016 Las Vegas Regional Winner
2014-? Mentor


Reply With Quote
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 10:59 AM
mrnoble's Avatar
mrnoble mrnoble is offline
teacher/coach
FRC #1339 (Angelbotics)
Team Role: Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: denver, co
Posts: 1,206
mrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond reputemrnoble has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

We are currently designing our off-season robot, which will be a football throwing bot that does multiple 50-yard passes (or whatever distance below that) from midfield for the Denver Broncos. It requires a lot of non-FRC parts, so far including the control system, the shooter wheels, the batteries, and perhaps the motors. Our constraints are different, so we are working to find out what we need and either procure it or build it ourselves. I'd say that off-season is the time to familiarize oneself with non-FRC stuff.
__________________
http://www.angelbotics.com

Remember why you're doing this.
Reply With Quote
  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 11:02 AM
Michael Corsetto's Avatar
Michael Corsetto Michael Corsetto is online now
Breathe in... Breathe out...
FRC #1678 (Citrus Circuits)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: May 2004
Rookie Year: 2002
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 1,268
Michael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond reputeMichael Corsetto has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I love COTS.

Familiar can be more than good, familiar can mean success.

My work once bought $10k+ of Versaplanetaries for a batch of robots we were making. We regularly use VexPro parts to prototype kick-$@#$@#$@# solar panel cleaning robots. Many of these parts won't see the production model but the familiarity we have with VexPro means we can prototype faster than the competition.

What some may see as a crutch, I see as a tool.

-Mike
__________________
Team 1678: Citrus Circuits - Lead Technical Mentor, Drive Coach **Like Us On Facebook!**
Reply With Quote
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 09-13-2017, 11:31 AM
Cothron Theiss's Avatar
Cothron Theiss Cothron Theiss is online now
Registered Muser
FRC #4462 (Full Metal Jackets)
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Rookie Year: 2013
Location: Kingston, Tennessee
Posts: 799
Cothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond reputeCothron Theiss has a reputation beyond repute
Re: FRC Outside of FRC

I think this is really more of a symptom of students leaving FRC without learning how to find a solution that best meets the constraints. The proliferation of COTS parts for FRC isn't the underlying an issue; an ignorance of how to select the right tool is. When all you've got is a hammer, every problem tends to look like a nail.
__________________
"It's taking longer than expected, which was to be expected."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi