|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Multi Speed Dual Motor Gearbox
Does anybody have any good plans for this item that integrate this years motors?
|
#2
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/pa... SC&sort=date
the white papers team 116 posted a nice one that uses last years' motors... the CIM's are the same, and i'm sure with minimal effort it can be changed to use this year's drills. keep checking back with that page, too... there are always people with great ideas sharing info in the white papers. |
#3
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
-dave |
#4
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
OK, so I finally got my act together and cleaned up the last two drawings, and folded them in with the rest of our white paper describing of our updated gearbox design. The "Mark 2" version of our gearbox is smaller, lighter, has fewer moving parts, and is easier to manufacture than the previous version. It is also updated to incorporate the new Bosch motors included in the 2003 FIRST kit of parts. The updated design has been posted in the White Papers section of the board. We hope this is useful. Let us know if you use, or improve upon, the design. Have fun!
-dave |
#5
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Matt |
#6
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
|
#7
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
There was a flange on one of the drive sprockets that got bent at the end of the day Saturday, and bent just about every match Sunday, causing the tread to come off and bind/tear at itself. It was a problem getting the power from the output shaft to the ground, not within the gearbox. Wetzel ~~~~~~~~~ Take it apart, get the bigger hammer. Again |
#8
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
It was very frustrating because we knew what was wrong, and how to fix it, but did not have the replacement parts or equipment to effect the repair. So we just had to keep pulling the tread assemblies apart after each match and pounding things flat with a hammer and re-assembling as fast as we could, and then keep our fingers crossed that it would stay together for two minutes. As I said elsewhere, next year we go with WHEELS!!! ![]() -dave |
#9
![]() |
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
I know EXACTLY how you feel. My fellow teammates and I are growing very tired of treads. For the little advantage they give in traction and climbability, they also give many headaches, breakdowns and inefficiencies. Maybe we should start a "I hate treads" club. Note to any designer wanting to do treads: be careful, they are very difficult to deal with. Team 45 has been doing treads for 4 out of the last 5 years (3 metal, one timing belt), and there are many issues to deal with. In my opinion, treads are not worth the effort. Andy B. Last edited by Andy Baker : 09-04-2003 at 03:55 PM. |
#10
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Very interesting that everyone is also having problems with the treads. Last year we went after a similar design to team 61, since we were impressed by the power that it laid down to the ground. We started with the blue supergrip belts from brecoflex (also known as 'break o flex') and they started out OK in practice. It was quickly apparent that the grate was eating them away rapidly but it was too late to do anything about it. After the first regional at Buckeye, two treads had ripped in half, through the metal bands and everything, of course the team 45 tranny in low may have had a bit to do with it
![]() If I had my way ![]() ![]() |
#11
![]() |
||||||
|
||||||
DON"T GIVE UP!
Quote:
Don't give up - FIRST might just not be the same without a techno-tank drive. If I may be so bold, let me suggest something. Carefully analyze the problems you are having with your design, list it's strengths and weaknesses, and then decide if you can do something to overcome it weaknesses without compromising its strengths. This is what engineering is all about! Our story: In 2002 we did 4-wheel crab. It had some advantages and some disadvantages. Just ask some of my team mates - I was so frustrated by the disadvantages that I declared towards the end of the season that "we will never do 4-wheel crab again". So what did we do in 2003? We did 4-wheel crab. We simply determined that its advantages were too valuable to pass up. So, we just had to figure out a way to overcome the disadvantages/weaknesses. We did and we are glad we did. Raul |
#12
![]() |
||||||
|
||||||
Re: DON"T GIVE UP!
Quote:
Thanks for the encouragement. I do feel that if we would choose to do treads again, we would make them much better and learn from some mistakes during last year's season. We are not totally ruling out treads, we just don't like 'em much right now. I agree that teams learn from mistakes and strive to make things better. We TechnoKats are not jumping to conclusions about drive trains until we see the kickoff. Andy B. |
#13
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
![]() ![]() -dave |
#14
![]() |
|||||
|
|||||
HAHA
I can see this evolving into something.....
Heck, you've got members, a flag, and EVEN a theme song. Metallica - Don't Tread on Me (it even sounds like a good anthem or theme song) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#15
![]() |
||||
|
||||
Re: Tracks are fun BUT...........
Quote:
A tip for teams looking at the correx gum. It did not work as well on the carpeting as the supergrip. MattB 902 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
pic: dual speed gearbox | CD47-Bot | Extra Discussion | 9 | 10-07-2003 02:04 PM |
Power, speed, and torque... AGH | Gui Cavalcanti | Technical Discussion | 5 | 11-10-2002 06:02 PM |
Calibrating speed controllers and joysticks | thedillybar | Technical Discussion | 4 | 02-11-2002 12:24 PM |
"Motors and Drive train edition" of Fresh From the Forum | Ken Leung | CD Forum Support | 6 | 01-29-2002 11:32 AM |