OCCRA
Go to Post The only fee our team charges is for your heart and soul. No refunds. - Koko Ed [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > Technical > Technical Discussion
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

 
Closed Thread
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 4.25 average. Display Modes
  #1   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 12:55 PM
Stevexe Stevexe is offline
FIRST Alumni/Mentor
AKA: Steven Pestana
FRC #0585 (the Cyber Penguins)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 2
Stevexe is an unknown quantity at this point
Question Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Any thoughts on Minibot standardization between teams to make sharing these bots easy between alliance partners? Some sort of standardized shape, volume, size, or mechanism to use to deploy the minibots that would work with a variety of deployment methods?
  #2   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 01:19 PM
darist darist is offline
Registered User
AKA: David Aristizabal
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Newark, NJ
Posts: 36
darist is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

good thinking!

No concrete ideas on my part yet, but certainly think this can be a valuable thread!

I also think a standard set of outputs from the robot can be helpful. Then one team team can design a self-contained mini-bot and deployer. The deployer can be attached to any robot as long as the robot provides the right signals, like a relay output, a digital output, and/or a PWM output. So team A can make a mini-bot and deployer (deployer easily attached to another robot's chasis) that uses a piston to deploy. Team B may want to use a digital output to deplay. Team C may want both a digital output and a piston. Team D may want to make the robot deploy with a PWM signal that goes to motor...

Still thinking out loud here, but lets keep the ideas flowing.
  #3   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 01:24 PM
Stevexe Stevexe is offline
FIRST Alumni/Mentor
AKA: Steven Pestana
FRC #0585 (the Cyber Penguins)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 2
Stevexe is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

A big incentive for standardizing Minibots is the Coopertition score, as well as the ease of use within your alliance sharing 'minibot duty'.

From the game manual:
5.3.5 Coopertition Score (CS)
Any borrowed MINIBOT which scores points by legally triggering the TARGET during the MATCH receives one (1) Coopertition point for the FRC TEAM registered for the event that is affiliated with the MINIBOT.
The total number of Coopertition points earned by a TEAM throughout the qualification matches will be their Coopertition score.

A clarification of some terminology that I found confusing at first:
HOSTBOT the electromechanical assembly used to carry the MINIBOT. (ROBOT MINIBOT = HOSTBOT). If a TEAM plays a MATCH without a MINIBOT, then the HOSTBOT is the ROBOT.
  #4   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 01:26 PM
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20,732
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Suggestion that may be practical: Design the interface such that the minibot is on a platform during the match. The platform then provides the launch point. If the minibot is designed to roll off the platform onto the base, or has that option, then it shouldn't matter too much which minibot is loaded on.

So, for the robot side, put a platform to either the base or the pole. If appropriate, make sure that it's notched for the pole. For the minibot side, have a base drive attachment.

Remember, all minibots are 12" cubes or smaller and 15 lbs or under.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots; 2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics; 2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk


  #5   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 01:28 PM
XXShadowXX's Avatar
XXShadowXX XXShadowXX is offline
They call me Cody.
no team (None currently :\)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2008
Location: Pontiac; MI
Posts: 408
XXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud ofXXShadowXX has much to be proud of
Standardizing the Minibot

It would seem to be in line with the principles of graceful professional to develop a sudo standard model of a minibot. I would like to elaborate on the why but hopefully we all see this.

What these means is we would need to build a standard 'casing' so that teams could create a standard adapter. To allow for maximum minibot hostbot comparability.

Also a standard umbilical connector to allow for minibot hostbot communication. To allow a go switch / charging port.
__________________
Is now an engineer thanks to FIRST.
  #6   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 01:34 PM
GGCO's Avatar
GGCO GGCO is offline
Registered User
AKA: Grant
FRC #3357
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 406
GGCO is a splendid one to beholdGGCO is a splendid one to beholdGGCO is a splendid one to beholdGGCO is a splendid one to beholdGGCO is a splendid one to beholdGGCO is a splendid one to beholdGGCO is a splendid one to beholdGGCO is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to GGCO
Re: Standardizing the Minibot

I'd love to see something like this done. However, I think it will be up to FIRST or one of the big/respected teams to develop this.

If anyone has any suggestions or wants to propose something, draw it in CAD first and make it publically known what teams are using the standard.
__________________
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - Albert Einstein
The FIRST Alliance
COMETS Robotics
Website

  #7   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 01:37 PM
avanboekel's Avatar
avanboekel avanboekel is offline
Registered User
AKA: Adam Van Boekel
FRC #5934 (Crowbotics)
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2010
Location: Oswego, IL
Posts: 378
avanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant futureavanboekel has a brilliant future
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

This is a good idea. I think it would work better with there only being a specific size. If someone would create a 'universal' shape, or design, there will be too many ideas, and everyone will want there design to be the 'universal' design.
  #8   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 01:40 PM
EricH's Avatar
EricH EricH is offline
New year, new team
FRC #1197 (Torbots)
Team Role: Engineer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 20,732
EricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond reputeEricH has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

I was thinking (dangerous I know) that it would be possible for the minibots to either have a tower contact button or a "you're on your own" dead-man switch, and just be running a program all match that said, wait until X switch toggles to the other position. Minimal programming needed. Or have the NXT in a standard-ish area so a servo mounted on a "flexible" arm could hit the run button easily.
__________________
Past teams:
2003-2007: FRC0330 BeachBots; 2008: FRC1135 Shmoebotics; 2012: FRC4046 Schroedinger's Dragons

"Rockets are tricky..."--Elon Musk


  #9   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 04:01 PM
luc.bettaieb's Avatar
luc.bettaieb luc.bettaieb is offline
Registered User
AKA: Luc Bettaieb
FRC #1329 (Roborebels)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 6
luc.bettaieb is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Yeah, I'd say as much as possible teams should strive to make their robots be able to launch any kind of minibot that can fit in the 12x12x12 inch dimensions.
  #10   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 04:16 PM
DMetalKong's Avatar
DMetalKong DMetalKong is offline
Registered User
AKA: David K.
no team
Team Role: College Student
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Bridgewater
Posts: 144
DMetalKong is a jewel in the roughDMetalKong is a jewel in the roughDMetalKong is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to DMetalKong
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
Suggestion that may be practical: Design the interface such that the minibot is on a platform during the match. The platform then provides the launch point. If the minibot is designed to roll off the platform onto the base, or has that option, then it shouldn't matter too much which minibot is loaded on.

So, for the robot side, put a platform to either the base or the pole. If appropriate, make sure that it's notched for the pole. For the minibot side, have a base drive attachment.

Remember, all minibots are 12" cubes or smaller and 15 lbs or under.
I feel like having a platform like this is the simplest and most practical option. It's really easy to just have a flat surface on top of your robot.
  #11   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 05:20 PM
caffel caffel is offline
Registered User
AKA: Charlie Affel
FRC #0423
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Rookie Year: 1999
Location: Springfield, PA
Posts: 72
caffel is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Good idea.
I suggest that we need to decompose the problem and at least describe these requirements:
1. envelope/modular shape for the MB.
2. delivery platform & temporary fastening approach (so MB stays put until it is deployed). Maybe the platform even includes a box which is just larger than the size of item 1.
3. execution: e.g. platform extends, then a 'pusher' slides the MB forward onto the pole and retracts.
4. MB recognizes contact w pole and starts up on its own.

Or ...
Platform extends fwd, latches a very small piece of FTC legal metal to the pole (minimalist Minibot) and spring launches the MB up the pole.
__________________
Charlie Affel,
Mentor 423
  #12   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 07:32 PM
remulasce remulasce is offline
Registered User
no team
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Rookie Year: 2007
Location: Mtn View
Posts: 155
remulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud ofremulasce has much to be proud of
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

This is a lot easier than it seems. Remember, the mini bot already uses a standard part system- FTC. All you need to do is drill FTC style holes all over a plate of metal. Then, before a match, determine where you want to connect mini and host bots on the plate, and put a bolt or shaft facing straight up at that point, with no nut holding the mini down. It is simply to prevent side-to-side movement. The mini is responsible for sensing that it is connected to the tower, at which point it must pull itself straight up, cleanly off the shaft/bolts. The host bot must extend the plate, with the mini bot, to the tower. No wiring or detach systems necessary.
__________________
Student 294: 2007-2011
Mentor 597: 2013-2015
Google SWE: 2015-

FRC Volunteer: 2017-
  #13   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 07:58 PM
Bjenks548's Avatar
Bjenks548 Bjenks548 is offline
Registered User
AKA: Brendan
FRC #0548 (Robostangs)
Team Role: Alumni
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Rookie Year: 2009
Location: Northville
Posts: 354
Bjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond reputeBjenks548 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

There was a similar idea to this last year to have a standard position for a suspension bar. As it was a great idea, it never worked because teams all went on their own plan.
__________________
Toronto Regional quarter finalists. Northville Winners/ Chairman's Winners. Troy Finalist/ GM Industrial Design Award. Michigan State Championship Finalists. CMP Newton Division winners! Triple Balance count 13. Thanks to 1075, 4307, 67, 3656, 217, 2604, 2054, 245, 118, and 2194! Photo credit for my avatar Dan Ernst


  #14   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 08:02 PM
DonRotolo's Avatar
DonRotolo DonRotolo is offline
Standing on their shoulders
FRC #0832
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rookie Year: 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 7,231
DonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond reputeDonRotolo has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGCO View Post
I'd love to see something like this done. However, I think it will be up to FIRST or one of the big/respected teams to develop this.
Don't wait fror FIRST to develop anything like this. It is up to teams.

Also don't wait for FIRST Robotics Team xxxx (or xxx or xx) to develop it - you're just as good. Just do it, everyone will comment, we'll come to a consensus....done.

Waiting for 'someone else' to do it is the wrong idea.
__________________

I am N2IRZ - What's your callsign?
  #15   Spotlight this post!  
Unread 01-08-2011, 10:59 PM
darist darist is offline
Registered User
AKA: David Aristizabal
no team
Team Role: Mentor
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rookie Year: 2006
Location: Newark, NJ
Posts: 36
darist is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Minibot Standardization (FRC 2011: Logomotion)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bjenks548 View Post
There was a similar idea to this last year to have a standard position for a suspension bar. As it was a great idea, it never worked because teams all went on their own plan.
This is a great reason to try again. What went wrong last year? What should we do different this year to get the standard defined clearly and adopted? Maybe a catchy name and logo would help (think about Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, HDMI, USB...)?

One idea already mentioned in this thread that I liked:
Compile a list of teams that commit to implementing the standard. When you get to the regional, you'll know what pits to visit for compatible minibots / hostbots.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 PM.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi