|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#121
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
![]() 179, I absolutely adore this robot. Depending on its scoring prowess, I can see this being a real dominating force at your regionals, but I'm sure that you'll be a great alliance partner no matter what happens. Thanks for sharing your great idea and good luck during the rest of build season! Last edited by ThirteenOfTwo : 02-02-2012 at 00:34. |
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
They should be able to lower the bridge, I think. They can use the whole ramp as a lever arm to push it down and drive on top of it. It's clearly strong, since they lift their robot with it. Should be able to handle it, I'd guess.
|
|
#123
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Wow! Once again you have shown that you are one of the most creative teams in the world. Your concept has completely shifted the paradigm of a difficult three-robot balance. I look forward to seeing you in action in Orlando - expect many suitors.
|
|
#124
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Thank you Andy, Glenn, Roger, Eric, Gary, Mike, Brandon, Sean, Jared, Drew and everyone for all the compliments and interest, we appreciate it. I think the rules vetting is very informative as to how it will be perceived by the refs etc.
To try and answer a few of the questions:
Another neat feature is the strain guages under the upper channel plate will measure upward force of the bridge so we can determine when opposing bot(s) weight is equal to our bots weight. Very colorful programmable LED strips will run up the sides of the ramp that can be seen from both sides of the ramp. The lights will rise as the weight rises, when they reach the top (equalized) they will blink red indicating whoever is driving out to the other end of the bridge to stop moving, then we lift. Plus we will use them like runway lights while the ramp is ready to be climbed. This bot should come in around 110lbs with bumpers, it's very light. I can't wait to see all this stuff do what it supposedly does. |
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
But you've thought of all this already, haven't you? |
|
#126
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
|
#127
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
|
|
#128
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Neat robot! Very aggressive in terms of rules interpretation -- I don't think I'm that brave... I'm not sure if that's a caution or a compliment!
![]() |
|
#129
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
Q:If a robot is designed to be contacted inside its own frame perimeter to aid in balancing, could a team request a waiver of G27 for touching inside its own frame perimeter to aid in balancing the coopertition bridge with an opponent? A: No. So any opponent robot that tries to climb you will earn themselves a G27 violation, complete with technical foul. Of course, you may well find times where this an entirely worthwhile tradeoff. Being qualifications though, I wish your coach luck in negotiating these and determining in-match whether they'll actually happen, if you decide to go that route. Note that G27 can also earn the opposing robot a yellow card for repeated or egregious violations. You may want a Q&A, but I'd suspect there's nothing much repeated (at least not in a single match, and I doubt you'll coopertition balance with the same robot twice) and certainly not egregious. |
|
#130
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
|
|
#131
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Very Very nice. I'm liking the wheelies that you're doing, it's a new method of getting over the barrier!
|
|
#132
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Quote:
http://vimeo.com/3277978 ![]() |
|
#133
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
I always look forward for 148.
|
|
#134
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
Three things
1: I love the idea of the arm, my team thought about and still might make one of those 2: A concern about a possible issue, when it is latched onto the ramp, the robot's ramp and its latcher ( not sure what to call it) might be both considered outside of the robots perimeter, maybe there would be a way to fix that 3: One of the reasons my team didn't build this right away was because we think there will be a rule update prohibiting this kind of latching on to something Hopefully it will be allowed, because I love this idea and I'd love to see it in competition, major wowfactor |
|
#135
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 179 Swamp Teasers
I dont see the pictures of this robot everyone is talking about?
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|