|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
If you look at the match in which that happen 118 was on Red and 488 was on blue. The Coopertition score is 0...this would actually imply it didn't count...
Time will tell... |
|
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Hmm, why would they post then? This is only going to get more and more frustrating until qualifications start.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
"successfully balanced" could just mean that the Bridge was level.
Successful != legal Like I said - the field system shows they were awarded 0 points. |
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
I read the tweet as meaning they were physically successful, not necessarily legally successful.
|
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Yes I do see it now. I did tweet them back for a more concise clarification on the ruling.
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
I was told by a student on another team that the ruling would be handed out tomorrow.
-Nick |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
I wouldnt be surprised if the Refs had to call the GDC and clarify if it's in the "spirit of the game".
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
There's a picture of that balance with 488 on the Robonauts facebook page. I think it's publicly viewable. Just search Robonauts.
|
|
#9
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
148's alliance just balanced 3 robots!
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Amazingly smooth balance.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
It was 148 922 and 2936 who had the triple balance!
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
that comeback with the 3-robot balance was truly amazing! Congrats on pulling it off!
|
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
TRIPLE BALANCE TWO!
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Alamo 2012
Im rooting for 148.
These matches are awesome. 148 won. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|