|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
2012 MSC
So who's excited for MSC this year. I know I am especially after witnessing Troy.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
The things that are going to happen at this tournament...definitely worth taking a break from college for
.I really hope there are multiple teams with flawless coop records here to make it really interesting. I know that's what Troy was! |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
It'll be a Coopertition competition more than anything else.
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Atleast the first two days...
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
I think it is more like an "Avoid not being able to balance on Coopertition bridge" during qualifying rounds. When most teams can balance on coopertition bridge, it will not be a deciding factor towards the seeding. It will be back to WLT.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Unless you are on on the field when it goes bad. Then you instantly drop relative to the rest of the field.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Quote:
I hope you're correct when it comes to win/loss records. Can't say I'm a fan of seeing undefeated teams in 10th place. |
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
With co-op happening more, and it swinging back closer to WLT I see some interesting things happening.
I see it shifting more towards the lesser scorers on the alliance doing co-op, in an effort to win the match, possibly resulting in less reliable co-op robots and a failure to do so, hurting everyone on the field. |
|
#9
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Quote:
As far as undefeated teams being ranked 10th, I don't inherently have a problem with it. Going undefeated and being ranked 10th tells me there is a strategy issue (qualification strategy, that is). I'm sure there are plenty of teams that would have fewer losses if they valued winning above the co-op bridge. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
A wild card at MSC should be alliance bridge capability. I expect to see a *lot* of "6 bridge" matches...
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
I refer to these affectionately as Triple Doubles and i wish that was an actual term in the manual even if it gave no bonus
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Our team is officially excited! It's going to be a long 1.5 (and counting) days of work...
Last edited by DjScribbles : 09-04-2012 at 16:34. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
Quote:
I can't see a team like HOT leaving it up to another team to balance the coop bridge, when it is so important to ranking. Also I do not see a team like HOT agreeing to balance with a less capable shooting machine while 469 cleans up in the last 30 seconds. I do think that the average time to balance on the coop bridge to be more around the 30 second mark rather then the 45+ at previous district events. -Clinton- |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
The politics surrounding the bridge at MSC shall be very interesting.
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 2012 MSC
The coop bridge at MSC will be very similar to Troy I believe.
"My stats say that you are the best balancer on your alliance...we want you to balance with us." |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|