|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
Here is a section view from our offseason project last fall. If you look carefully inside the tube, you can see the space the bearing block has to slide back towards the gearbox and loosen tension (to the right). Also, here's a view of how we kept the bearing block in place. http://i.imgur.com/VrDEJ.png It worked, but it really wasn't the greatest method. It should get you thinking though, and we came up with it halfway through building it. Last edited by Gray Adams : 12-10-2012 at 22:04. Reason: Added picture |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
However I do know that with the WCD it allows for wheels to be removed much easier because the shafts do not need to be removed. |
|
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
What does 25 do? why are they an exception?
|
|
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
6WD flat. I don't know how they do it, but they don't bounce when turning, even with high-traction wheels. I think it has something to do with how they groove their tread, but I'm not sure.
At least, they used to do that. I'm not sure if they still do or not. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
For weight it honestly depends: if you are running tube then WCD is a pretty good choice to save weight. If you are running sheet there is really no need to run a WCD. However wether you run sheet or tube you always should drop the center wheels and should direct drive the center wheel.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
No outer framing. Basically eliminates about 86" of outer railing (assuming a 37" long by 27" wide bot). Center wheel is direct drive, so less chain (6 chains per average 6WD, 4 for your average 6WD WCD).
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
WCD's are known to be lighter but they aren't always lighter.
![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
Nothing stops a team from direct driving on a standard chassis, and a standard chassis does not require bearing blocks. |
|
#13
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Okay, new questions to ask.
In my WCD design I have designed the wheels to be far enough from the outside to allow for interchangeable wheel sizes of 4in, 6in, and 8in. Is this a good idea? I have read somewhere that you use 4in wheels to save weight, go faster, and keep your wheels as far to the outside as possible. Is this true? Should I design my WCD to use one type of wheel? Also, can you weld the AM Flanged bearings to standard aluminum wall? (6061 I think). Thanks! |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Generally speaking the bearings are pressed into the alum, or sometimes held in place with super glue if needed.
|
|
#15
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Re: WCD vs Standard
Quote:
The smaller wheels allow for smaller gear ratios and sometimes fewer reductions in the gearbox, this usually results in a more lightweight gearbox. I do not know about keeping the wheels as far out as possible as a motivation for smaller wheels, I would usually try to do that anyways regardless of wheel size (just my preference no real reasoning on my part behind it). |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|